Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Raminder Kaur v. Delhi Development Authority

21 Mar 1994 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:2831

The Delhi High Court held that denial of flat allotment under the "wrong address policy" cannot be based on mere suspicion and directed proper verification and a speaking order before deciding on the petitioner’s entitlement.

administrative other Significant wrong address policy ration card change of address allotment of flat

Pankaj Kumar Pathak v. Canara Bank Erstwhile Syndicate Bank

01 Nov 1993 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10299

The Delhi High Court held that deduction of one third pension on compulsory retirement without a reasoned order and consultation with the Board of Directors violates natural justice and set aside the deduction.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pension deduction compulsory retirement natural justice Regulation 33

Birma Devi and Ors. v. UOI and Anr

10 Sep 1993 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:760-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that casual labourers granted temporary status but not regularised before retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits due to the employer's failure to regularise, overruling the denial of pension on procedural grounds.

labor appeal_allowed Significant temporary status casual labourers regularisation pensionary benefits

M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries (India) Ltd v. Umed Singh (Deceased) ThrLrs & Ors

03 Sep 1993 · The Chief Justice; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:8720-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory order closing the right to lead evidence, holding such orders are not appealable judgments under the Delhi High Court Act and CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant appealability interlocutory order judgment definition Delhi High Court Act 1966

Dipak Arora & Anr v. Vijay Bhushan Arora & Anr

04 Jun 1993 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:5600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for refund of Rs. 12 lakhs based on a written MOU, rejecting unparticularized fraud pleas and reducing interest to 8% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant memorandum of understanding parol evidence rule fraud and misrepresentation written contract

Central Board of Trustees (EPFO) v. M/S Era Infra Engineering Ltd.

03 May 1993 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2137
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that while the principal employer is liable for PF dues of workers employed through contractors, the Adjudicating Authority must conduct proper enquiry and identify beneficiaries before assessment, and procedural fairness must be ensured in appellate proceedings.

administrative remanded Significant Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7A EPF Act principal employer liability contractors and sub-contractors

Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State

06 Nov 1992 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:3979-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to reasonable doubt arising from forensic and testimonial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 498A IPC dowry harassment benefit of doubt

Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State

06 Nov 1992 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:3976-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dowry cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to insufficient evidence, modifying sentences to time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 302 IPC Dying declaration Dowry harassment

National Building Construction Corporation v. M/s Sharma Enterprises

02 Apr 1992 · Jasmeet Singh
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award except for the interest component, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the contract barred pendente lite interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 31(7) Contract termination

Ajay Kumar Bhagat and Ors. v. B.L. Sherwal and Anr.

31 Dec 1991 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5402

The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition for non-compliance of an interim order due to delay beyond the one-year limitation period under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

civil petition_dismissed Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience limitation period Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Ari Singh (Deceased) Thr. LRs v. UOI

22 Jul 1991 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:563
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court dismissed a restoration application filed after a 25-year delay due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay and upheld the dismissal of the original appeal for default.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay restoration of appeal default dismissal Limitation Act

Rajveer Sharma v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.

12 Apr 1991 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2017:DHC:1192
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are maintainable against the NTPC Pension Trust as it performs a public function, entitling retired employees to mandamus for pensionary benefits under the Scheme.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition maintainability public function private body

Vipin Kumar and Anr v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors

20 Sep 1990 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:345-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld UPSC's recruitment process, ruling that introducing a screening test with 50% interview weightage before commencement was lawful and not arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recruitment process screening test interview marks allocation rules of the game

Vishav Priya Singh v. Union of India

25 Jul 1990 · G. S. Sistani; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:3488-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Summary Court Martial and punishment awarded for disobedience, rejecting the petitioner's challenge to jurisdiction and procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Summary Court Martial Army Act 1950 Section 41(2) Army Act Section 164(2) Army Act

Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Inder Jit Dua

20 Sep 1989 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting Selection Grade under the Career Advancement Scheme to a regularised Lecturer without requiring a Master's degree, affirming that CAS benefits extend to pre-1996 recruits appointed by upgradation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Career Advancement Scheme AICTE circular Selection Grade Regularisation

Rajinder Parshad Sharma v. State

31 May 1989 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:363
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed Will in favor of the adopted son and sole beneficiary after objections were withdrawn through a settlement, exempting him from furnishing an administration bond.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 valid Will attestation

Rajiv Raizada v. Union of India

31 Mar 1989 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:1948
Cites 1 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court held that employees who failed to opt for continuation under CPF by the statutory cut-off date are deemed to have switched to the Pension Scheme and are entitled to pension benefits despite administrative lapses and delay in implementation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Contributory Provident Fund Pension Scheme Export Inspection Council Option exercise cut-off date

Sabu Trade Pvt Ltd v. Raj Kumar Sabu

20 Mar 1989 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2072
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of RKS/STC restraining defendants from using the SACHAMOTI trademark, upholding the prima facie validity of registered trademark rights pending trial.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement SACHAMOTI trademark Interlocutory injunction Trade Marks Act 1999

S.K. Tripathi v. Secretary Agricultural Produce Market Committee & Ors.

30 Aug 1988 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2017:DHC:1304

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of a daily wager terminated for bribery, holding that termination without formal inquiry was valid where natural justice was complied with and Supreme Court directions did not bar termination for misconduct.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization daily wager termination bribery

Shri Anil Kumar Gupta (Deceased) through LRs v. Smt. Nisha Sharma

22 Apr 1988 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:4345
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, upholding the Rent Control Tribunal's eviction order on unlawful subletting, affirming limited supervisory jurisdiction and evidentiary standards in tenancy disputes under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(b) Eviction petition Subletting