Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
Sanjay Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in matrimonial disputes.
Dargah Paanch Peer v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's order dismissing a suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to lead evidence despite repeated opportunities, holding that mere filing of an affidavit without tendering it as evidence does not amount to prosecution.
Jammu & Kashmir State Power Development Corporation v. K.J.M.C.Global Market (India) Ltd
Delhi High Court upheld arbitral award granting compensation and fees to financier for delays and breaches by state power corporation in arranging project financing, dismissing challenge under Section 34.
Jaswant and Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on a mutual settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jitesh Kumar Yadav v. Satpal Yadav and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a partition suit holding that property inherited from a maternal ancestor post-1956 is self-acquired and not ancestral property forming part of a Hindu Undivided Family, thus no right of partition arises.
Abhishek Manohar v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Virender Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 406, 468, and 471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vinayak Rathore v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363 and 323 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shakila & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sumit Kumar v. Registrar General, High Court of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed writ petitions challenging flawed questions in the Delhi Judicial Preliminary Examination, directing deletion of certain questions and re-evaluation of results in line with established judicial review principles for multiple choice answer keys.
Devender Kumar & Anr v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement, emphasizing the Court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vijit Vinod Nautiyal v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rishi Pal Singh Tomar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ram Kishan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting pension to an employee who sought voluntary retirement, rejecting the employer's claim that he had resigned and forfeited pension rights.
Parveen Choudhary v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties and directed compensation to the Victims’ Compensation Fund.
Union of India v. Nishith Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the CAT's direction to hold a review Departmental Promotion Committee after the respondent's ACR grading was upgraded post the original promotion decision.
Skipper Limited v. Abir Infrastructure Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputes over delayed delivery and payment claims were arbitrable despite a Memorandum of Understanding between the parties.
Rajinder Tandon v. Master Prince
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decree holding that the Wills were invalidly executed and the respondent was entitled to half share in the suit property by intestate succession.
Rajender Kumar Saini v. Krishan Kumar Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's rejection of a probate petition due to unreliable attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will's execution.
K.B. Gupta & Anr. v. Harbhajan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application for impleadment of third-party purchasers in a specific performance appeal, holding that only the plaintiff can decide parties to the suit and third parties must file independent proceedings to perfect title.