Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Seema v. Jasbir

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3878
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a deceased self-employed victim by accepting higher income without future prospects and upheld insurer's recovery rights due to void insurance policy caused by non-disclosure of owner's death.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Compensation Loss of dependency Future prospects

Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3890-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC arising from an accidental firearm discharge, allowing the petition subject to community service, emphasizing the complainant's forgiveness and the private nature of the dispute.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 307 IPC accidental injury Article 226 Constitution

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sh Sajan Nayak

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3882

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging a motor accident compensation award, excluding future prospects from calculation and rejecting impleadment of the Vikram driver, affirming negligence solely on the bus driver.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence future prospects loss of earning capacity

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sh Sajan Nayak

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3881

The Delhi High Court held that future prospects cannot be included in compensation without evidence for self-employed claimants, affirmed sole negligence of the bus driver in a rear-end collision, and reduced the awarded compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim future prospects negligence compensation calculation

New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Subhash Chander Gupta & Ors.

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3883

The insurer was exonerated from liability and granted recovery rights where the driver failed to produce a valid driving licence despite notices, placing the burden on the owner and driver to prove licence validity.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving licence insurance liability Order 12 Rule 8 CPC

Saurabh Mamgain v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

13 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3874

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by revising income and damages, upheld 65% disability, and increased interest to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of future income permanent disability non-pecuniary damages

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Hemlata & Others

13 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3877

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the tribunal's award of compensation to the deceased's legal heirs in a motor accident claim involving contributory negligence of both vehicle drivers.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed motor accident claim contributory negligence witness credibility compensation

Seema v. Jasbir

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3876
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by properly assessing the deceased's income and held that non-disclosure of owner's death voids the insurance policy but insurer remains liable to pay with recovery rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects self-employed

Sunil Kohli & Ors. v. Subhash Chand Dua & Ors.

13 May 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:3875

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit for possession and declaration barred by limitation under Article 64 of the Limitation Act, affirming that agreements to sell do not confer title and cancellation of defendant's title does not revive limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation possession declaration agreement to sell

Mohd. Kausher Parvez v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:3885-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable and lawful settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Jyoti & Anr. v. Parminder Pal Singh & Ors.

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3871

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for death of a child in a motor accident by applying an inflation-adjusted notional income method with age-based multipliers and increased interest rate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation death of child notional income

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Rani Devi & Ors.

13 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3872
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that future prospects cannot be added to notional income without proof of progressive income rise, reducing compensation in a motor accident claim while enhancing loss of estate award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects notional income

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Khursheed & Ors.

13 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3873
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court modified compensation in motor accident death claim by excluding future prospects, upheld insurer’s liability despite driver’s license endorsement issue, and enhanced interest and non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects insurance policy breach

Bharat Kumar v. Union of India and Others

13 May 2016 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:3869-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition modifying earlier directions to grant the petitioner seniority in the actual NDA course joined, not the earlier batch missed due to medical unfitness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Defence Academy seniority medical unfitness training requirements

Satish v. Union of India

13 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:3864

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Indian Navy’s declaration of unfitness for appointment due to hyperhidrosis, holding that medical fitness standards are within the service’s discretion.

administrative petition_dismissed hyperhidrosis medical fitness Indian Navy appointment

Vicky v. Union of India

13 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:3865

The Delhi High Court directed a Review Medical Board to resolve conflicting medical fitness reports concerning a Navy recruitment candidate, holding its findings final and binding.

administrative petition_allowed medical fitness Indian Navy recruitment Review Medical Board ectopic thyroid

Bhagmal (Deceased) Thru. LRs v. UOI & Ors.

13 May 2016 · V.K. Shali, J. · 2016:DHC:3870

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeals holding that the land was validly acquired by the Government, the suit was barred by limitation, and no substantial question of law arose to interfere with the acquisition or possession rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act valid acquisition possession permanent injunction

Court on its Own Motion v. Pradeep Bansal

13 May 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:3868-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt proceedings against Pradeep Bansal after accepting his unconditional apology for disruption caused due to non-supply of documents and court proceedings were restored without further penalty.

criminal petition_dismissed contempt of court court proceedings disruption non-supply of documents unconditional apology

Arvind v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

13 May 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:3862

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence, emphasizing caution in relying solely on uncorroborated testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape sole testimony prosecutrix corroboration

Romesh Kumar Wadhwa v. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare

13 May 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:3867-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld expert committee recommendations treating certain drugs as equivalent for government tender evaluation, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the e-tender conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed e-tender drug equivalence L-1 calculation Essential Medicines List Committee