Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajender Prasad

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4022

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim, rejecting contributory negligence and recalculating loss of future income based on superannuation age, while increasing interest to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence loss of future income permanent disability

Rakesh Jain v. Mithilesh Mishra & Ors.

17 May 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:3996

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal challenging the validity of a General Power of Attorney executed by the landlord, holding that a tenant lacks locus standi to dispute ownership and that the suit was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed General Power of Attorney tenant rights cause of action limitation period

Ali Mohmmad Khan v. Pinki & Ors.

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4003

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, setting aside the tribunal's award due to insufficient evidence and remanding the matter for further inquiry with opportunity to lead additional evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 140 motor accident claim

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SUMAN VERMA

17 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:3999

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, holding that absence of a valid permit for the taxi constituted breach of insurance policy terms, entitling the insurer to recover compensation paid from the owner and driver.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy breach valid permit Order 12 Rule 8 CPC

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SUMAN VERMA

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4000

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, holding that absence of a valid permit breached the insurance policy, entitling the insurer to recover compensation paid from the vehicle's owner and driver.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy breach valid permit Order 12 Rule 8 CPC

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SUMAN VERMA

17 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4001

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, holding that absence of a valid permit constitutes breach of policy terms entitling the insurer to recover compensation paid from the vehicle's owner and driver.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy breach valid permit Order 12 Rule 8 CPC

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Pushpa Devi

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4010
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including all regular allowances in the deceased's income and increasing non-pecuniary damages, directing the insurer to pay the revised amount with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation calculation transport allowance conveyance allowance

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. NIRMALA DEVI & ORS

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4004

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and held it liable to pay compensation based on the cover note despite the insurer's claim of dishonored premium payment cheque.

civil appeal_dismissed motor vehicular accident insurance liability cover note premium payment

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Vineet Kumar Chaudhary

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4005

The insurer was allowed to recover compensation paid from the owner and driver due to the driver’s invalid license and the owner's failure to verify it, absolving the insurer of liability.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability valid driving license breach of insurance policy

Ram Nath v. Union of India & Ors.

17 May 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:4006-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the DPC's authority to independently assess ACR gradings and dismissed the petition challenging the denial of promotion despite upgraded ACRs.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Annual Confidential Report Office Memorandum 10.04.1989 Office Memorandum 08.02.2002

Food Inspector v. Mohd. Alim

17 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4026-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a respondent in a food adulteration case due to substantial unexplained variation between expert reports, holding that the sample was not representative as required under the PFA Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 representative sample food adulteration Public Analyst report

Dheeraj Goel v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

17 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4027-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

Sangeeta Singh v. State (Govt of N.C.T of Delhi) & Ors

17 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4030-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between business partners, holding that private offences not affecting society can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Sachin Gupta & Ors. v. The State of Govt of N.C.T Delhi & Ors.

17 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4029-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC and Article 226 of the Constitution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Article 226 Constitution matrimonial dispute

Deepak Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

17 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:3997

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination at a neutral hospital after conflicting reports on the petitioner's hypertension to ensure fair assessment before rejecting his paramilitary recruitment.

administrative other Review Medical Examination medical fitness hypertension paramilitary recruitment

Sonu v. Union of India & Ors.

17 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:4008

The Delhi High Court directed re-examination of a paramilitary recruit after surgery, holding that medical fitness must be determined after an adequate recovery period, with the final decision by a competent hospital being binding.

administrative other Review Medical Examination medical fitness paramilitary recruitment hydrocele swelling

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Seema Pandey; Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Rani Pandey

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4016

Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards by excluding future prospects without proof, adding loss of estate, and increasing interest rate to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects minimum wages

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Seema Pandey; Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Rani Pandey

17 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4015

Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards by excluding future prospects from minimum wage calculations, adding loss of estate, and increasing interest rate to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency future prospects loss of estate

M.R. Krishna Murthi v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

17 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4014

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal enhancing compensation by ₹50,000/- for disability-related expenses while upholding the tribunal's assessment of permanent disability and loss of future income based on the claimant's age at the time of the accident.

civil appeal_allowed motor accident claim permanent disability loss of future income compensation enhancement

Hariom Gurjar & Anr v. Union of India & Ors

17 May 2016 · Hima Kohli; Ashutosh Kumar · 2016:DHC:4019

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a representation before the competent authority.

constitutional petition_dismissed territorial jurisdiction writ petition maintainability High Court of Delhi