Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Neelam Devi & Ors.

24 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4297
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by excluding future prospects for a self-employed deceased, recalculating dependency loss with a reduced multiplier, and enhancing interest to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency future prospects multiplier motor accident claim

Ravi & Ors. v. State & Ors.

24 May 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4260

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences based on an amicable compromise, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences compromise

Simranjeet Singh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

24 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4305-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, subject to compensation conditions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Ashish Ranjan Nayak v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

24 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4302-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Pravinder @ Moti v. State (NCT of Delhi)

24 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul, J · 2016:DHC:4301-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing parole for a convict, holding that administrative delays cannot bar parole when eligibility criteria are met.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole Article 226 Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010 police verification

Rohit Tiwari v. State

24 May 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4258
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a rape conviction where the prosecution failed to prove that the appellant obtained consent by false promise of marriage, emphasizing that mere breach of promise does not amount to rape under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent false promise of marriage rape Section 376 IPC

Satpal @ Monu & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

24 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4303-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 506 IPC following reconciliation of the matrimonial parties and withdrawal of maintenance proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Tarun Kumar Nayak v. State

24 May 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:4304-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 279 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that private offences resolved amicably can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 279 IPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC

The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Rahul

24 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4285

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest in a motor accident claim involving permanent disability, directing separate awards for disfigurement and loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity

New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Mahinder Singh & Ors.

24 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4286

The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability in a motor accident claim despite the driver's license not specifically authorizing the special vehicle, as no causal link to the accident was proved.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability driving license validity light motor vehicle

State v. Rohit

24 May 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4256

The High Court set aside the trial court's show cause notices against police officers for alleged non-compliance of Section 19 POCSO, holding that due compliance had been made and no further penal action was warranted.

criminal appeal_allowed POCSO Act Section 19 POCSO security to protected witness show cause notice

Hari Shankar Sharma & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

24 May 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4257

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 324, 325, 427, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR inherent powers compromise

Davinder Bakshi & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 May 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4259

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC compromise

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SHAMA PARVEEN

24 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4290

The Delhi High Court modified the compensation award in a motor accident claim by correctly assessing disability under the Employees’ Compensation Act and upheld the insurer's right to recover from the owner and driver due to the driver's invalid license.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability loss of earning capacity Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shama Parveen

24 May 2016 · R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4291

Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation by recalculating loss of earning capacity, enhancing non-pecuniary damages, increasing interest rate, and upheld insurer’s recovery rights due to driver’s invalid license.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of earning capacity Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 non-pecuniary damages

Aziz Ur Rehman & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

24 May 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4261

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 452, 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR inherent powers of High Court non-compoundable offences

Anshu Singh v. Allahabad Bank & Anr

24 May 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:4267

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a bank officer's transfer order, holding that such administrative decisions are not ordinarily subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or violative of policy.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order judicial review service matter administrative discretion

Hemant Jain v. Sidharth Jaju & Ors.

24 May 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4266

The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 96 CPC against an order referring parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 8 Arbitration Act Appeal under Section 96 CPC Order referring to arbitration Decree under CPC

Dr. Ajay Kumar Saxena v. The Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests & Ors.

24 May 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:4298-DB

The Delhi High Court held that relaxation of recruitment eligibility criteria must be granted by the competent authority following prescribed procedure, and an appointment without meeting minimum qualifications is illegal and not protected by natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant relaxation of eligibility criteria Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education Rules appointment eligibility Board of Governors power

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd v. Ramesh Chand Sharma & Ors.

24 May 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4287

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is not liable to indemnify if the driver lacks a valid license with required hazardous goods endorsement but must first satisfy the claim award before recovering from the owner and driver.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving license endorsement hazardous goods vehicle insurance policy breach