Delhi High Court

33,441 judgments

Year:

Tata Capital Limited v. Rishab Sharma

27 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4643
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and must not decide the dispute's merits at this stage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement judicial scrutiny

SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UMA SHANKAR SAHU

27 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4740
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator arbitrability employment agreement

Ankit Kasana v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4648

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a sexual assault case, holding that a consensual relationship and prior settlement indicated false implication, subject to conditions to safeguard investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC consensual relationship

Neelima Chadha v. Jatinder Talwar Alias Mickey Talwar

27 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4649

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.15,000 per month, ruling that foreign income must be assessed considering cost of living and the petitioner's earning capacity.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. income abroad cost of living

Krishan Kumar Bansal v. Union of India

27 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court upheld the Supreme Court's review ruling that DRI officers are proper officers under the Customs Act, validating their show cause notices and proceedings, and directed restoration of notices for adjudication with appeals to CESTAT.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Proper Officer Customs Act 1962 Show Cause Notice

Saroj Bala Gupta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

27 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:1893-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date such benefits became due, rejecting financial hardship as a ground to deny past interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment financial hardship Central Administrative Tribunal

Sunil Kumar Dhaiya v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 29, Delhi

27 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4480-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 issued for AY 2014-15 after a search conducted post 31.03.2021 is barred by limitation when computed from the date of reassessment initiation, setting aside the notice accordingly.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153C limitation period

TATA SKY LIMITED v. S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.

27 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:4674

The Delhi High Court directed comprehensive compliance and procedural measures to address unauthorized domain name registrations infringing trademarks and clarified roles of banks and associations in preventing misuse of brand names in banking identifiers.

civil other Significant domain name infringement trademark rights injunction domain name registrars

SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. SOMNATH RANGNATH PARVE

27 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4743
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate employment-related disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement scope of judicial scrutiny

Greatech Fashions v. S K Industries

27 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4613-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the recovery suit was barred by limitation despite COVID-19 period exclusion, as no fresh acknowledgment or part payment was made to extend limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed limitation period COVID-19 exclusion recovery suit legal notice

Mr. Amit Singh v. Sh Dheeraj Pal

27 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petitions and upheld the Tribunal's order directing extension of MACP and pensionary benefits to similarly situated personnel based on binding precedent and principles of parity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal MACP Scheme pensionary benefits delay and laches

Pooja Mehta & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

27 May 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, C.J.; Tushar Rao Gedela, J. · 2025:DHC:4424-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside an eviction order under the Senior Citizens Act for failure to issue mandatory show cause notice, emphasizing harmonization of rights under the DV Act and Senior Citizens Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 eviction show cause notice

Tarun Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4438

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a valid settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Anil Kumar Vats v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellant Anil Kumar Vats of murder charges due to lack of evidence of common intention, upheld acquittal of other accused, and affirmed the admissibility and reliability of CCTV and hostile witness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant common intention criminal conspiracy hostile witness CCTV evidence

Sh. Kunal Aggarwal & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

27 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4443

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable compromise and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise

Mrs Rupinder Kaur & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4439

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR on the ground of an unconsented compromise and refused protection from arrest to proclaimed offenders with pending bail applications.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR compromise proclaimed offender anticipatory bail

Prabhakar Kabra v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

27 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4488

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking FIR registration for alleged Provident Fund violations and wrongful termination, holding the dispute to be civil and not warranting criminal investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Provident Fund Employees Provident Fund Act

Vinod @ Babli & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

27 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4437

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for mutual assault under Section 110/3(5) of BNS following compromise between parties, subject to payment of costs.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise mutual assault non-grievous injury

Indu Narain v. State Bank of India & Ors.

27 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4428-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging possession and sale of property by SBI under SARFAESI Act, holding no binding settlement existed despite partial payments by the petitioner.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act settlement agreement one-time settlement debt remission

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. JSIW INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

27 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of arbitral awards for patent illegality where the arbitrator disregarded clear contract terms on excise duty reimbursement, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Patent illegality