Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
JAIPUR MARBLE STONE CORP v. LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings where possession was taken but compensation was unpaid before the 2013 Act are deemed lapsed, directing compensation payment under the 2013 Act without requiring land return.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid for five years, directing payment of compensation despite land utilization.
Dr. Rajesh Aeren v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was refused to the accused in a multi-victim financial fraud case involving complex corporate transactions and diversion of investor funds, as custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for effective investigation.
Om Prakash Bawa v. Badri Bhagat Jhandewalan Temple Society
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal in a possession suit, holding that cause of action arises from assertion of hostile possession and that mere possession without such assertion is insufficient to claim adverse possession.
Puja Dubey v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Army's disciplinary actions following a fatal parasailing accident were grossly inadequate and directed initiation of proportionate disciplinary proceedings, affirming judicial review over penalty proportionality in administrative matters.
Tirupati Busicom Private Limited v. Lucere Lighting Solution Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.
U C C Care Private Limited v. UCC Crafts Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement between two companies, based on majority written consents and absence of pending proceedings.
M/S KISHOO FARMS v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings without timely compensation lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, but compensation must be paid if the land has been utilized.
Gulshan Sahni v. Faquir Chand Sahni
The High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing leave to defend based on counsel's binding concession and dismissed the petition challenging the same due to delay and sanctity of court concessions.
Satish Sharma v. Dinesh Dhiman
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to include damages arising from the same cause of action, emphasizing that such amendments are permissible at the initial stage to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
Amina Bharatram v. Sumant Bharatram and Ors.
The Delhi High Court's original civil jurisdiction in family law matters enumerated under Sections 7 and 8 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is ousted where a Family Court is established, as the High Court is deemed a 'District Court' for such jurisdiction.
RATIONAL ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Shiv Khorana, Adv. v. BALKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD .....
The Delhi High Court held that the decretal amount includes principal, interest, and costs, and directed the respondent to deposit the full amount with additional costs before proceeding with the leave to defend application.
Parwana Co-Op Group Housing Society Ltd. v. Registrar Cooperative Societies
The provided text is an index page referencing a judgment dated 19.07.2016 in W.P.(C) 253-257/2004 without substantive content for analysis.
Canopy Nirmans Private Limited v. Terra Realcon Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and no secured creditors or pending proceedings existed.
Allied Trademart Private Limited & Ors. v. JMR Buildwell Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of transferor companies without winding up upon compliance with statutory requirements.
Surinder Pal Singh v. Ved Prakash Deceased through his LRs
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for a suit for specific performance begins from the date of refusal to perform, not the date fixed for performance, and remanded the suit for trial instead of dismissing it at the preliminary stage.
R.P. Sharma v. Registrar Cooperative Societies
The Delhi High Court held that an Administrator appointed during supersession cannot validly enroll new members in a cooperative society, rendering such memberships and related arbitration awards void, and dismissed the petitioners' claim to flats based on such invalid membership.
Gurmeet Singh Bawa v. Mrs. Gurcharan Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a possession suit where the appellant failed to prove termination of contractual tenancy, holding that tenancy rights devolve on all legal heirs under general succession law absent termination.
Sh. Luice M. Jacob v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding that the appellant failed to prove ownership by adverse possession over the Armenian Cemetery property allotted to the Armenian Association by the Government.
S P Garg v. State
The High Court allowed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. setting aside the trial court's order that denied the accused the right to cross-examine the complainant in pre-charge evidence, emphasizing the right to a fair trial.