Delhi High Court
68,862 judgments
Ajab Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date.
Gajinder v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, declaring the petitioner’s acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment.
SAMO v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Balraj v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
Gajraj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, granting the petitioner a declaration to that effect.
All India Carrom Federation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of All India Carrom Federation elections held in 2015, emphasizing strict compliance with the Sports Code and Ministry oversight to ensure fair and transparent elections.
Vipin Malik & Anr. v. PACL India Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the execution petition against PACL India Ltd., holding that the Supreme Court-appointed Lodha Committee's exclusive mandate precludes release of funds for rent arrears, granting liberty to seek alternative remedies.
Govind Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed AIIMS's review petition, holding that resignation acceptance conditional on penalty payment is ineffective without such payment.
Through: Mr. N. Mahabir and Mr P.C. Arya, Advocate v. CHIKITSABROTI UDYOG (SANJIVAN HOSPITAL) & ORS
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to enforce an interim award and appointed a Local Commissioner with police assistance to remove hypothecated medical equipment from Respondents' premises.
Saroj Bala Sapra & Ors. v. Amar Preet Singh Chadha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) does not permit complete demolition and reconstruction, and tenants raising serious triable issues are entitled to leave to defend eviction petitions.
State v. Mohit
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual offence case due to failure of prosecution to prove the prosecutrix's minority and inconsistencies in evidence.
Emerson Process Management Power and Water Solutions Inc v. Controller of Patents
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of software-related patent applications based on obsolete grounds and remanded them for fresh consideration under current Patent Office guidelines.
Smt Jodhian (Since Deceased Through LRs) & Ors. v. Methodist Church in India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the respondent's ownership and rejecting the appellants' plea of adverse possession and bar of suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.
Bhim Rao Yadav and Anr v. Chairman-cum-Managing Director and Ors
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's non-adjudicatory orders and remanded the petitioners' overtime allowance claim for fresh consideration on merits.
Saroj Gambhir v. Jaipal Singh Tanwar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging eviction where the tenant was personally served and failed to file leave to defend within time, rejecting allegations of fraud and invalid service.
Sushila Devi Jain v. Rajinder Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord’s revision petition, holding that the tenant raised triable issues on bona fide requirement warranting leave to defend in the eviction proceeding.
Sushila Devi Jain v. Adesh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to the tenant in an eviction petition, holding that disputed facts about alternative accommodation and bona fide requirement raised triable issues requiring trial.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS v. UDAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a teacher on the ground that the chargesheet and punishment were issued by authorities lacking jurisdiction under the CCS (CCA) Rules after his elevation to Group 'B' status.
M/S DRS LOGISTICS (P) LTD & ANR. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that use of registered trademarks as backend keywords in Google's advertising platform does not constitute trademark infringement or passing off, and Google is entitled to intermediary protection under the IT Act.
IACUITY TELCO SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the plea of limitation cannot be decided at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed reference of disputes to arbitration under DIAC.