Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Hero Cycles Ltd v. Naveen

08 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6383

The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by consent based on the defendant's undertaking not to infringe the plaintiff's registered trademark 'HERO' in the future.

civil other trademark infringement passing off registered trademark undertaking

Prabhat Sanitaryware Pvt Ltd v. Century Sanitaryware Pvt Ltd

08 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6382

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a joint compromise application and granted a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed compromise application trademark dispute court fees refund Section 16A Court Fees Act

ENEROIL OFFSHORE DRILLING LTD v. CENTEK LIMITED

08 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6381

The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' joint settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and disposed of the patent infringement suit accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC settlement patent infringement voluntary settlement

IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR v. M/S DYNAMIC MOVERS PVT LTD

08 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6380

The court dismissed the application to keep the execution petition in abeyance after the related application to set aside the ex parte decree was withdrawn and directed transfer of execution proceedings to the court having territorial jurisdiction over the Judgment Debtor's assets.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex parte decree transfer certificate

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Seema & Ors.

08 Sep 2016 · J. R. Midha · 2016:DHC:6391

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award including future prospects and loss of love and affection, dismissing the insurer's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects multiplier method

PARNIKA COMMERCIAL & ESTATE (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Sep 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:6392

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the appointing authority failed to do so within the statutory period following the previous arbitrator's withdrawal.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitrator withdrawal

PARNIKA COMMERCIAL & ESTATE (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Sep 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:6393

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after the original arbitrator withdrew and the appointing authority failed to act within the statutory period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitrator withdrawal

ANK ELECTROVISIONS PVT LTD v. M/S S.T ENTERPRISES & ORS

08 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6374

The Delhi High Court recorded a Settlement Agreement and accepted post-dated cheques as payment, disposing of the suit with liberty to the plaintiff to seek relief if the cheques are dishonoured.

civil appeal_dismissed Settlement Agreement post-dated cheques payment schedule undertaking to honour cheque

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Pradeep & Ors.

08 Sep 2016 · Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6375

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of accused in a robbery case, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie evidence and judicial mind at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant prima facie case framing of charges Test Identification Parade recovery of stolen goods

Anjum v. Yunus Saleem

08 Sep 2016 · Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6376

The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's revision petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that a gainfully employed wife residing in the husband's house and availing his facilities is not entitled to maintenance.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance gainful employment burden of proof

Brij Lal & Sons v. D.D.A.

08 Sep 2016 · Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:6389

The Delhi High Court upheld a reasoned arbitral Award and dismissed delayed, incoherent objections filed without condonation of delay under the Arbitration Act, 1940 and Limitation Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Limitation Arbitration Act 1940 Limitation Act 1963

Faisal Qureshi & Ors. v. State & Ors.

08 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:6390

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging framing of charges under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, holding that prima facie allegations of dowry harassment and criminal breach of trust justified proceeding to trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC dowry harassment criminal breach of trust

Bright Export Limited v. Central Board of Trustees, EPF Organisation

08 Sep 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2016:DHC:6372

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the dismissal of the writ petition against the EPF Appellate Tribunal's order, holding that the squad report was duly provided and no valid grounds for review existed.

administrative petition_dismissed Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7A squad report review petition

Prem Giri v. Daulat Ram & Anr.

08 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6395

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to recall the complainant and examine the accused after closure of evidence in a cheque dishonour case, holding that such applications cannot be allowed to cause delay or fill lacunae in defence.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 311 Cr.P.C. Section 315 Cr.P.C. Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque

Sukho Khalsa Senior Secondary School v. Director of Education

08 Sep 2016 · Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:6397

The Delhi High Court held that minority aided schools do not require Directorate of Education approval for appointing Principals, quashing the impugned administrative order restricting the Principal's authority.

administrative petition_allowed Significant minority aided school appointment of Principal Directorate of Education approval Delhi School Education Rules 1973

State N.C.T of Delhi v. Nazir @ Nanhe & Anr

08 Sep 2016 · Gita Mittal; P.S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6396-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition challenging the acquittal of accused in a stabbing case, upholding the trial court's finding of unreliable prosecution witnesses and condoning delay in filing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed condonation of delay witness credibility improvement in testimony planted witness

Avtar Singh (Deceased) through LRs v. Harbhajan Singh and Ors.

07 Sep 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:9186

The Delhi High Court disposed of family property appeals by recording a compromise decree recognizing equal undivided ownership and possession rights, directing property mutation and enabling enforceable settlement.

civil appeal_allowed family property dispute compromise decree undivided ownership possession rights

Amarjeet Singh Malhotra & Anr. v. The State & Anr.

07 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9055

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would serve no useful purpose.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 amicable settlement withdrawal of complaint

Chopra Marketing P. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:8988

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging bail granted to respondents in a fraud case, holding that absence of evidence of interference with investigation and prior bail to main accused justified maintaining bail orders.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail anticipatory bail Indian Penal Code Section 420 IPC

Deepak Singh v. Naresh Kumar & Ors.

07 Sep 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:8632

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for recall and related applications by the legal heirs as infructuous and not maintainable following the death of the petitioner and absence of allotment of vending sites.

civil appeal_dismissed application for recall death of petitioner legal heirs teh bazaar/vending sites