Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
ATC Telecom Tower Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to grant interim relief securing exit fees and outstanding dues in a telecom infrastructure sharing dispute despite respondent's spectrum sale and financial difficulties.
Ayub @ Munna v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges after admitting additional blood group evidence disproving forensic reports, emphasizing the necessity of corroborated evidence for conviction.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nadeem Ahmed and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim award directing Rs.10 lakhs deposit without disability proof but granted Rs.25,000 interim relief with interest upon production of a disability certificate under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Indus Towers Limited v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited Formerly Known As Datacom Solutions Ltd
Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 Arbitration Act is maintainable in disputes between telecom infrastructure providers and operators, enforcing exit charges as genuine pre-estimate of damages, and granted security and injunction pending arbitration.
Satbir Singh Malik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses if compensation is not paid within five years, applying section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and declared the acquisition of petitioners' land lapsed.
Indu Arora v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation has occurred within five years of the award.
Friends Motel Pvt. Ltd. v. Supertrack Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to pay outstanding rent and utility dues in installments and allowed correction of typographical errors in its earlier order, while leaving other disputes to arbitration.
Hindusthan Urban Infrastructure Ltd. v. Ramesh Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement for residential occupation and rejecting the tenant's plea of alternative accommodation.
Aditya Mahajan v. Shachi Mahajan
The Delhi High Court held that visitation rights should not be restricted based on a single interaction with a hesitant child and directed Family Courts to use counselling to facilitate parent-child bonding and progressively increase visitation.
M/S Habib Enterprises v. M/S Nature Essence Pvt Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer and consolidation of two identical suits pending in different courts to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and facilitate combined trial.
TV Today Network Ltd & Ors v. Rameshbhiduri
The High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions filed by TV Today Network Ltd. with liberty to raise the pleas before the Trial Court, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.
Mukesh Gawari v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused under IPC and POCSO Act, holding that absence of specific allegations and no requirement for custodial interrogation justified bail with conditions.
M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV ANR v. IMTIAZ AHAMED & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against defendants for infringing the registered trademark "IKEA" and passing off, emphasizing deterrence against evasion of court proceedings.
Ashish Tanwar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Miss Y v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order committing a rape case to the Sessions Court under Section 323 Cr.P.C., rejecting the Sessions Court's remand for further recording of the victim's statement.
Veer Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Puran Chand Kashyap & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498-A/406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure ends of justice and prevent abuse of process.
Om Prakash & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 394/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kanwaljeet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 452, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure ends of justice and prevent abuse of process.
Ami Lal (Lrs) v. P.N. Bahl
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the plaintiff’s ownership and entitlement to possession against unauthorized encroachment, awarding costs for prolonged litigation.