Delhi High Court

70,895 judgments

Year:

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association v. Union of India

21 Sep 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:6662-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 1989 Military Engineer Services Regulations and 1991 IDSE Rules, affirming the composite military-civilian character of MES and rejecting challenges based on procedural and constitutional grounds.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineer Services Army Act 1950 Article 309 Composite cadre

Siddharth International Public School v. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal & Anr

21 Sep 2016 · G. Rohini; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:6658-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the direction to admit a differently-abled accident victim child under the EWS category in a private school, affirming the broad constitutional jurisdiction to enforce rights under the RTE Act despite procedural and jurisdictional objections.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Education Act, 2009 EWS category admission Article 226 jurisdiction Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

Aditi Upadhyay v. Lalit Kumar & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6656-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that an unregistered relinquishment deed cannot confer title to immovable property and oral family settlements must be bona fide and acted upon to be enforceable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement relinquishment deed registration Registration Act 1908

Sunil Mohan Buckshee v. M.M. Buckshee & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:6655

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal affirming that the suit property was self-acquired by defendant No.2 and not Hindu Undivided Family property, as the plaintiff failed to prove HUF existence and contribution of HUF funds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Undivided Family HUF property self-acquired property partition suit

Intelligrape Software Private Limited v. Tangerine Digital Entertainment Private Limited

21 Sep 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:6675

The Delhi High Court allowed a first motion application dispensing with shareholders' meeting, directing unsecured creditors' meeting, and exempting the holding company from separate proceedings for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 holding company exemption

Narendra Khetwani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:6657

The Delhi High Court directed summons to be issued to all accused persons where prima facie material exists in a forgery complaint related to a property sale, while dismissing the petition for police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summons forgery Section 467 IPC Section 468 IPC

Nand Kishore Garg v. Jitender Singh Tomar & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:6676

False declaration of educational qualification in election nomination papers constitutes corrupt practice rendering the election void, and such election petitions cannot be summarily dismissed or stayed due to pending related proceedings.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant election petition false declaration educational qualification corrupt practice

Mini Appa Kanda Swami @ Mani v. M Indra

21 Sep 2016 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DEEPA SHARMA · 2016:DHC:6663-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal for divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that demands for separate accommodation were not cruelty, dowry demands barred relief, and irretrievable breakdown is not a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 divorce separate accommodation

Suraksha Sadan C.G.H.S. Ltd. v. Registrar, Coop. Societies & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:6667-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an executing court cannot re-examine the merits of a decree affirmed by a superior forum and can refuse execution only if the decree is void ab initio or a nullity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant executing court Section 47 CPC disqualification of membership Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules 1973

TENDRIL FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. NAMEDI LEASING & FINANCE LTD.

21 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6666-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a suit for non-prosecution due to pendency of a party transposition application, restoring the suit and directing fresh adjudication of interim applications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant non-prosecution transposition of parties Order 1 Rule 10 CPC interim applications

Nawab Chandela v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Sep 2016 · S. P. Garg · 2016:DHC:6665

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to admit a CD and call detail records, holding that the petitioner has remedy to confront the witness and no illegality was found in the order.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 91 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Article 227 Constitution electronic evidence

Shakti Bhog Foods Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

21 Sep 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:6668-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that tax liability arises independently of the validity of the return and upheld the revenue's authority to recover admitted tax dues despite the return being declared invalid under section 139(9).

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 139(9) Section 140A Section 226(3)

Vikram Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

21 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:6670

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the complainant could himself produce the necessary evidence during trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 200 Cr.P.C. Cheque dishonour

Chitra Saini v. State & Anr.

21 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:6671

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to summon additional witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, emphasizing the necessity and relevance of evidence and preventing delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 311 Cr.P.C. Dishonour of cheque Summoning witnesses

Narendra Khetwani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:6659

The Delhi High Court held that summons must be issued to all accused with prima facie involvement in forgery offences, but refused to direct police investigation where civil and criminal proceedings are pending.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summons forgery Section 467 IPC Section 468 IPC

Zillion Inraprojects Pvt Ltd v. Alstom Systems India (P) Limited

21 Sep 2016 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:6661

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees cannot be restrained on mere contractual disputes without prima facie proof of egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bank guarantee invocation arbitration contract termination

Manju Panwar v. V.P.S. Panwar

21 Sep 2016 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DEEPA SHARMA · 2016:DHC:6660-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that the wife's conduct, including false complaints damaging the husband's reputation and alienation from family, constituted mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act false complaints

Aneesh Bansal & Anr. v. Veerender Khatri & Ors.

21 Sep 2016 · Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:6673

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement for business premises genuine and no suitable alternative accommodation available, dismissing the tenant's challenge.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

CSL Holdings Private Limited v. CSL Finance Limited

21 Sep 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:6674

The Delhi High Court approved a scheme of arrangement between two Non-Banking Financial Companies, dispensing with certain meetings based on consents and directing a supervised meeting of the transferee company's equity shareholders.

corporate other Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 Non-Banking Financial Company

Sanjay Rawat & Ors. v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court

21 Sep 2016 · G.S. Sistani; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:6672-DB

The Delhi High Court held that co-terminus contractual appointments terminate automatically with the tenure of the appointing authority without requiring separate termination, dismissing the petition challenging such termination.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant co-terminus appointment contractual employment termination of service Article 310 Constitution