Delhi High Court
70,895 judgments
Akhil Kumar Saini v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to consider transfer requests of Law Centre-II students to vacant seats in preferred law centres and accepted the University’s assurances to improve academic facilities.
Akhil Kumar Saini v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to consider student transfer requests from Law Centre-II to preferred Centres if seats become vacant and to address concerns about facilities, ensuring equitable treatment of law students.
Patna Water Supply Distribution Networks Private Limited v. Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a three-member arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to resolve disputes between petitioner and BUIDCo, rejecting objections based on jurisdiction, res judicata, and applicability of the Bihar Act.
Akhil Kumar Saini v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging admission to Law Centre-II, directing the University to consider transfers to other law centres based on merit and to address facility concerns.
Akhil Kumar Saini v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to discontinue evening classes for Law Centre-II students, provide library and placement facilities, and consider transfer requests to preferred law centres based on merit and seat availability.
Akhil Kumar Saini v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to consider student transfers to preferred law centres if seats become vacant and recorded the University's commitments to improve facilities at Law Centre-II.
Kritika v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the mathematics grade assessment of a minor student, holding that subjective academic evaluations are not subject to judicial review under Article 226.
Saomya Saxena v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking relaxation for promotion in the LLB course, holding that the mandatory Promotion Rules requiring clearance of 15 papers cannot be relaxed and past illegal relaxations cannot be perpetuated.
Insecticides (India) Limited v. Raja Pathak & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff for trademark and copyright infringement against defendants using a deceptively similar mark, decreeing the suit under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-appearance.
Sweety Gupta v. Neety Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte preliminary decree in a partition suit, holding that summons sent by registered post with refusal endorsement create a presumption of service that cannot be rebutted by mere denial without evidence.
Pushkar Gupta v. Narender Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that refusal to comply with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights does not bar a spouse from obtaining divorce under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, especially when justified by reasonable cause such as wrongful criminal prosecution.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Nirmala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation by applying a lower multiplier based on the claimant mother's age and enhanced the interest rate to 9% per annum in a motor accident death claim.
Magneti Marelli Powertrain India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court upheld the need to treat technical assistance fees as separate international transactions but ruled that the Transactional Net Margin Method must be consistently applied, remanding the matter for fresh arm's length price determination.
Jayesh & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that for construction plans involving common areas co-owned by all owners, NOCs from all co-owners are mandatory, directing DDA to decide the petitioners' application accordingly.
Megh Shyam Sharma & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a possession suit to itself to be heard along with a related declaration and partition suit to avoid conflicting orders and multiplicity of proceedings.
Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co Ltd & Ors. v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an injunction against use of certain trademarks was limited to toothpaste and did not extend to toothbrushes, setting aside the lower court's broader interpretation.
Pink Housing Keeping v. Centre for Development of Telematics
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the award of a housekeeping contract, holding that the lowest responsive bid included statutory bonus and the tender process was lawful.
Mohini Aggarwal & Anr. v. Deepika Sarees Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors who were not in charge of the company's business at the time of cheque issuance, holding that criminal liability requires actual control and responsibility.
Vivek Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court held that a Special Judge cannot direct the CBI to investigate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and upheld dismissal of a complaint alleging election expenditure manipulation by an MLA.
Sweety Gupta v. Neety Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte preliminary decree in a partition suit, holding that summons sent by registered post with postal refusal endorsement creates a presumption of service which the defendant failed to rebut.