Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Aayush Giri & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving commercial fraud allegations on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Nirmal Anand & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shankar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors. v. Babu Lal Bunkar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction to regularise a differently-abled daily wager under the Persons with Disabilities Act, emphasizing the statutory mandate for 3% reservation and rejecting administrative objections.
Karan Chopra & Ors. v. State of NCT (Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Dheeraj Sharma & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Harjit Singh & Ors. v. State of Govt of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
M/S Kohli Traders v. The Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the electoral list for non-compliance with objection timelines and upheld the validity of the election process at an advanced stage.
Deepak Kumar v. Office of the District and Sessions Judge (HQs) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking technical resignation as the petitioner failed to inform the employer at joining about prior government job application, a mandatory condition under the binding Office Memorandum.
S.N. Singh Rathore v. Director of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of an illegally appointed teacher without prior approval of the Directorate of Education under Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act is lawful and dismissed the writ petition challenging such termination.
M/S. BREWERIES FILTERS SYSTEM PVT LTD v. SUBHASH CHAND & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the illegality of the workman’s termination but substituted reinstatement with back wages by compensation payable to the deceased workman’s widow in a phased manner.
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SURAJ PAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing compensation in a fatal accident claim to Rs.10 lakhs with 9% interest, aligning with the Supreme Court's Uphaar tragedy precedent and setting aside penal interest.
Wasim Khan v. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a driver holding a valid heavy vehicle license at the time of an accident cannot be held liable to indemnify the insurer, absolving the driver from recovery claims.
Chetan Sharma v. State & Another
The Delhi High Court held that both the CBI and Delhi Police have concurrent jurisdiction to investigate corruption offences in Delhi and declined to transfer investigation to CBI, emphasizing the need for diligent investigation and proper use of electronic evidence.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Pale Ram
The Delhi High Court clarified that under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, judicial review of dismissal approval is limited to prima facie validity and natural justice, and set aside the Tribunal's order refusing approval to the dismissal of a conductor by Delhi Transport Corporation.
Mahinder Pal Singh v. The Principal Lady Shree Ram College for Women and Ors.
The court held that the petitioner could not be regularized as a permanent employee prior to the date the post was officially sanctioned, dismissing the writ petition for retrospective service benefits.
BUMIHIWAY(M)SDN,BHD v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that future interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration Act is not payable on pre-award interest when the arbitral tribunal expressly excludes such interest in its award.