Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Manju Devi Poddar v. Hari Prakash Poddar

28 Nov 2016 · Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:7671

The court held that a declaratory counter claim filed by a defendant in possession without seeking consequential relief requires fixed court fee payment and that limitation is a disputed fact to be decided on evidence.

civil other Significant declaratory suit court fee Section 7(iv)(c) Court Fees Act Article 17(iii) Schedule II Court Fees Act

KAY KAY TEXO FAB PVT LTD v. M/S NAVKAR FURNISHING & ORS

28 Nov 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:7675

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, holding that old age and inadvertent delay by counsel do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act sufficient cause limitation period

th November, 2016 K.C. RAKESH ..... Petitioner Through Dr. J.C. Vashishta, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person. v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....

28 Nov 2016 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHAND... · 2016:DHC:7676-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claim for interest on delayed pensionary benefits, holding it barred by res judicata and limitation, and that delay was partly attributable to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_dismissed interest on delayed pensionary benefits res judicata limitation qualifying service

Subodh Dass v. Govind & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · J.R. Midha · 2016:DHC:7691

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim to include loss of earning capacity based on 80% disability, cost of artificial limb, and increased interest rate to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability loss of earning capacity artificial limb compensation

Deepak Kumar Mittal v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:7677

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the freezing of a bank account on police instructions, allowing withdrawal with liberty to seek relief in criminal proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed account freezing bank instructions police investigation writ petition

M/S FRANKE FABER INDIA PVT.LTD. v. COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES, DELHI

28 Nov 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:7678-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 24 of the DVAT Act without fresh material is invalid and cannot overturn a final classification order under Section 49 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 DVAT Act reassessment Sales Tax Act classification finality of order

Director General of Works & Ors v. Harvir Singh & Anr

28 Nov 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Vinod Goel · 2016:DHC:7681-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the respondent's entitlement to retrospective regularization from the date of initial appointment after passing the trade test, in line with similarly placed employees.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularization casual worker muster roll trade test

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Abid Ali & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · J.R. Midha · 2016:DHC:7680

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld compensation with interest awarded to the deceased's dependents, condoning delay due to extreme poverty.

labor appeal_dismissed Employees Compensation Act compensation claim delay condonation interest on compensation

Sanjeet Ram v. State

28 Nov 2016 · Gita Mittal; Anu Malhotra · 2016:DHC:7688-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of Sanjeet Ram for murder under Section 302 IPC based on reliable eyewitness and forensic evidence, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony forensic evidence

Vinod Malik & Ors. v. Delhi Energy Development Agency & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:7661

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging dismissal orders of three government employees found guilty in departmental enquiry for involvement in issuing bogus driving licences and irregularities with Polaroid cards.

administrative petition_dismissed departmental enquiry bogus driving licences Polaroid cards dismissal from service

Som Datt Enterprises Limited v. Vijay Cable Industries & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:7662

The Delhi High Court held that a judgment-debtor's willful breach of a court-recorded settlement undertaking constitutes civil contempt punishable under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court undertaking to court settlement agreement execution petition

Zahoor Ahmed Akhoon v. Archaeological Survey of India

28 Nov 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:7659

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for compassionate appointment on the ground that it lacked territorial jurisdiction since the cause of action arose in Jammu and Kashmir where the petitioner resides and the order would be communicated.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction compassionate appointment cause of action communication of order

National Highways Authority of India v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

28 Nov 2016 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2016:DHC:7668

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral interpretation that revised rates apply to entire BOQ quantities once thresholds are met but set aside part of the award on additional costs due to perverse findings rejecting undisputed Engineer reports.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Contract interpretation Clause 52.[2] COPA

Rajeev Bansal v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:7666

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the freezing of a bank account on police directions, allowing withdrawal with liberty to seek relief in criminal proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed bank account freezing police directions criminal investigation writ petition

Monika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Rati Ram & Anr.

26 Nov 2016 · S. Muralidhar

The Delhi High Court held that an Agreement to Sell without purchaser's signature is enforceable against the seller, appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, and granted interim status quo relief pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 9

Dr. Asha v. University of Delhi and Ors.

25 Nov 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:7647

The Delhi High Court held that only the Governing Body of a college has authority to appoint the hostel Warden unless power is delegated, invalidating the petitioner’s appointment by the Principal and Staff Council.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Warden appointment Governing Body Staff Council University of Delhi

Gurvinder Singh Saini v. Director of Education and Ors.

25 Nov 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:7646

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful, non-stigmatic termination of a probationary teacher’s services, rejecting claims of deemed confirmation and malafides.

labor petition_dismissed Significant probationary service termination stigmatic order confirmation of service

Manju Barjatya v. Uma Singh

25 Nov 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2016:DHC:7653-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Manju Barjatya, set aside the ex parte decree against her under Order XXXVII CPC, and held that liability must be clearly pleaded to pass a decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend loan liability sole proprietary firm

Parveen Kumar v. Har Prakash

25 Nov 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:7652

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal seeking recovery of an alleged loan amount, holding that only the security deposit was proven and recoverable under the tenancy agreements.

civil appeal_dismissed security deposit loan agreement tenant landlord dispute burden of proof

Pradeep & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi

25 Nov 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:7648

The High Court allowed recall of the Investigating Officer for effective cross-examination, emphasizing the accused's right to a fair trial despite counsel's absence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. recall of witness Investigating Officer