Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Pinnacle Textiles Private Limited v. Indus Garments Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation of five transferor textile companies with a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding no objections or prejudice.
Kaushal Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and rape charges, holding that voluntary accompaniment and medical evidence of age negated the offences under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.
Pawan @ Mama v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable injured witness testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.
Hameeda Shahzad v. Shahjahan Khatoon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition, holding that bona fide requirement for eviction under section 14(1)(e) does not require prior business experience or negate due to temporary employment or alimony received by dependent family members.
Kirti Premraaj Jain v. Moser Baer Clean Energy Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of summoning orders under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admitted issuance of cheques for advances creates legally enforceable liability attracting criminal liability despite pending civil disputes.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-1 v. Jaipuria Infrastructure P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions under Section 153A, ruling that additions must be based on incriminating material seized during search and cannot be made arbitrarily on pre-search enquiries.
Shobha Printers Private Limited v. Lahar Enterprises Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Arrangement for demerger under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors where all consents were obtained.
RRJ Infrastructure Company Private Limited v. Fountain Beverages Private Limited v. Pearl Drinks Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing two wholly owned subsidiaries to merge into their holding company, subject to statutory compliances and liabilities.
Jindal Polymer Products Private Limited v. Shatabdi Paper Mills Private Limited; Annapurna Steels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of arrangement involving demerger and merger of investment businesses between three companies under the Companies Act, 1956, after approvals and absence of objections.
HSIL LIMITED v. MARVEL CERAMICS AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a trademark infringement suit where the cause of action did not arise in Delhi and the plaintiff falsely pleaded non-existence of a branch office, resulting in the plaint being returned.
Harishankar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 354/341/323/506/457 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Nahar Enterprises Private Limited v. Matis Financials Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Arrangement for demerger under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings due to unanimous written consents of shareholders and creditors.
Dr. Saurabh Kumar Gupta v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding of negligence against the car driver, enhanced compensation for non-pecuniary damages, and dismissed the insurer's plea to absolve liability.
Marvel Farm Products Private Limited v. Dynamic Orbits Management Services Private Limited & Knowledgeage Technologies Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation of two transferor companies with a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding no objections and directing compliance with statutory requirements.
Pawan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 308 and 323 IPC for assault causing grievous injuries during a Lohri celebration, while reducing the sentence to a more proportionate term.
Pawan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for grievous and simple injuries under Sections 308 and 323 IPC, affirming identification and medical evidence while reducing the sentence for excessiveness.
Pawan v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for grievous and simple injuries under Sections 308 and 323 IPC but reduced the sentences considering the nature of injuries and circumstances of the case.
Gauhar Hussain v. Mumtaz Ara
The Delhi High Court held that an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to alter maintenance orders requires proof of change in circumstances and that a divorce not valid under Muslim Personal Law cannot discharge maintenance liability under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
Laxmi Narain Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where possession was not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Y D Builders & Hotels Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that inordinate and unexplained delay in refiling a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, affirming the strict limitation regime for challenging arbitral awards.