Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Renu Singh v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court permitted the discharge of the petitioner’s brother from AIIMS despite an interim order, directing the hospital to provide all relevant medical records and digital data to the petitioner.
Sanjeev Kumar @ Kalia v. State
The Delhi High Court modified murder convictions under Section 302/34 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, emphasizing the need for proof of common intention and premeditation, and reduced sentences accordingly.
Shalu Raghav v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order discharging the accused in a rape case, holding that the prosecutrix's credible testimony suffices to frame charges despite inconclusive Call Detail Records.
Saurabh Kumar @ Sonu Baba v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and related IPC provisions based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jai Prakash @ Guddu v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 452 and 354A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
DAULAT RAM COLLEGE SOCIETY v. YOGESH TYAGI
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-compliance of an order that was rendered infructuous following the Court's decision on a recall application.
Gopal Singh Hanot v. UCO Bank & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DRAT order as not maintainable since an appeal against the same order was already pending before the DRAT.
The Chairman, New Delhi Municipal Council v. Dr. G. S. Thind
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of pension withdrawal proceedings under Rule 9(1) of the CCS (Pension) Rules against retired NDMC officers convicted of corruption, quashing the Tribunal's contrary findings.
Raman Suri v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that establishing a separate police station for electricity theft is a policy decision beyond judicial mandate and directed respondents to implement existing enforcement measures and committee suggestions.
Fauja Singh v. The Director of Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging retrenchment of school drivers, holding that the employer complied with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, including notice and compensation requirements.
Dr. Rahul Bhayana v. Dr. Rohit Bhayana & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator, leaving issues of arbitrability and fraud to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S SRIRAM CABLES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that no fresh Section 21 notice is required before appointing a fresh arbitrator after an arbitral award is set aside due to unilateral appointment, and accordingly appointed a new arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Staff Selection Commission v. Darpan Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing evaluation of the respondent’s answer sheet despite a technical error in OMR coding, affirming that non-substantive procedural lapses should not bar meritorious candidates from public employment.
Glocal Medical College Super Speciality Hospital and Research Centre v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Council of India's denial of renewal of permission for MBBS admissions to a medical college due to gross deficiencies and obstruction of inspections, emphasizing deference to expert regulatory authority.
Laxmi Memorial Public School v. Suresch Chand Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding that Respondent 1 was an employee of the petitioner school and dismissed the Review Petition challenging this on the ground of overage, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226.
Commissioner of Police, Delhi v. Ravinder
Termination of a probationary police officer under Rule 5(1) of the TS Rules without a formal departmental inquiry is stigmatic and illegal, requiring adherence to natural justice principles.
EICORE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. v. EEXPEDISE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs to file additional documents discovered post-suit filing under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, while disallowing documents already in plaintiffs' possession without reasonable cause, emphasizing procedural compliance in commercial suits.
Jeewan Holdings Private Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld RBI's cancellation of an NBFC's registration for failure to meet the prescribed net owned fund within the stipulated time, holding that delay cannot be condoned and no personal hearing beyond show cause notice is mandated.
Benara Solar Private Limited v. Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying contractual incentive for delayed project completion beyond six months, holding that no incentive is payable despite excusable delay and rejecting the petitioner’s plea of duress in accepting a revised incentive scheme.