Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

Ravi Kumar Sinha v. The Commissioner of Income Tax

27 Apr 2007 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6076-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court held that shares allotted under an ESPS subject to lock-in cannot be valued at market price for taxation; FMV must reflect transfer restrictions, and notional benefits during lock-in are not taxable income.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Employees Stock Purchase Scheme Fair Market Value lock-in period perquisite valuation

R. S. Meena v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

12 Apr 2007 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8431-DB

The Delhi High Court held that officers assigned current duty charge of higher posts are not entitled to the higher pay scale unless formally appointed, remanding a related pay claim for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Fundamental Rule 49 current duty charge look after charge pay scale entitlement

Joseph Varghese v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Mar 2007 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6955
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court directed payment of ex-gratia compensation to the family of a blood bank Quality Manager who died of COVID-19, holding that employees in designated COVID-19 hospitals performing duties exposing them to infection qualify as performing COVID-19 duty under the relevant Cabinet decision.

administrative petition_allowed Significant COVID-19 duty ex-gratia compensation Cabinet Decision No. 2835 private COVID-19 hospital

UOI v. K. Zachariah & Ors.

16 Mar 2007 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:459-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order relying on an overruled Supreme Court precedent and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal Supreme Court precedent overruling remand

Jasbir Singh Bhalla & Anr v. UOI & Ors

16 Mar 2007 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:258-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's promotion-related judgment and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court's overruling of the Rangaiah principle.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion rules Armed Forces Headquarters Stenographers’ Service Rules Departmental Promotion Committee Rangaiah principle

M/S Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Andhra Bank

06 Mar 2007 · Vibhu Bahru · 2019:DHC:2970
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a bank must disclose commission charges on the unexpired period of a bank guarantee at the time of issuance, and levy of undisclosed charges is an unfair practice under RBI guidelines.

civil petition_allowed Significant bank guarantee commission charges pre-payment charges RBI guidelines

Archana Aggarwal & Anr v. D.D.A.

07 Feb 2007 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1924
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the DDA to convert the appellants’ leasehold property to freehold within two weeks, rejecting delay tactics based on pending misuse charges.

property appeal_allowed Significant leasehold to freehold conversion Delhi Development Authority misuse charges lease restoration

M/S Prakash Industries Limited v. Union of India and Anr.

12 Jan 2007 · Yashwant Varma
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court held that the Enforcement Directorate has jurisdiction to provisionally attach properties under the PMLA based on reasonable nexus to scheduled offences, rejecting challenges that such attachment requires prior predicate offence proceedings, while emphasizing procedural compliance and the limited scope of Special Judge's jurisdiction in coal block allocation cases.

criminal other Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Provisional Attachment Order Enforcement Directorate Coal Block Allocation

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Vikram

13 Oct 2006 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9886-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a departmental clarification equating SAV to B.Ed. validates the respondent’s promotion to PGT despite an earlier committee’s rejection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Post Graduate Teacher SAV qualification B.Ed equivalence

Pharmacyclics LLC & Anr. v. Hetero Labs Limited & Ors.

06 Oct 2006 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9246
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an IPAB patent judgment under the de facto doctrine, granting interim injunctions against defendants infringing the patent for Ibrutinib.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant de facto doctrine patent infringement interim injunction IPAB judgment

Gemalto S.A. v. The Controller of Patents and Others

30 Jun 2006 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8351

The Delhi High Court set aside a patent rejection order based on outdated guidelines and directed fresh consideration under revised Computer Related Invention guidelines.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Procedural patent application Computer Related Invention guidelines patent examination reconsideration

Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Limited v. Speciality Meditech Pvt. Ltd.

22 May 2006 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5039-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's registered trademarks were descriptive or unused standalone marks, and the respondents' use of FEMICONTIN was bona fide and not infringing or passing off.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off family of marks descriptive mark

Delhi International Airport Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Apr 2006 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:4370
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court held that lease termination under the 2002 lease deed takes effect only after the 12-month notice period with due compliance, and contractual disputes without statutory basis are not ordinarily amenable to writ jurisdiction, dismissing DIAL's challenge to MoCA and AAI's decisions permitting HCI to retain possession.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant lease termination airport land contractual dispute writ jurisdiction

Shri Khailesh Garg v. M/S Abhipra Capital Limited and Anr.

13 Apr 2006 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:7416

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award against the petitioner, holding that notice was duly served and the respondent had locus to invoke arbitration despite disputes over the agreement and substituted service.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration service of notice substituted service arbitral award

Airports Authority of India v. Delhi International Airport Ltd.; Airports Authority of India v. Mumbai International Airport Ltd.

04 Apr 2006 · Yashwant Varma · 2024:DHC:8028

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award interpreting the OMDA's definition of "Revenue" to exclude capital costs and other specified deductions, directing refund of excess Annual Fee paid by airport JVCs to AAI with interest.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Operation Management and Development Agreement Annual Fee Revenue definition Capital costs deduction

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

26 Feb 2006 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:5082-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that royalty payments made by Samsung India Electronics to its parent for technological know-how were at arm's length and not subject to transfer pricing adjustments, rejecting the Revenue's claim that the payments were to itself as a contract manufacturer.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant transfer pricing arm's length price royalty payments contract manufacturer

SI (GD) Hanumant Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India

01 Jan 2006 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula · 2018:DHC:9011-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that CRPF Sub-Inspectors are entitled to pay fixation at Rs. 10,230 plus grade pay of Rs. 4,200 under the ACP Scheme by applying the 1.86 multiplier, directing respondents to grant consequential benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme ACP Scheme Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 pay fixation

Rani Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2005 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5041-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police officer absconding after criminal charges, ruling that family pension is not payable despite presumed death after seven years, as dismissal without enquiry was valid and pension rights forfeited.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant family pension dismissal from service absconding departmental enquiry

KTM-AG v. Honda Motorcycles and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

22 Dec 2005 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8769

The Delhi High Court disposed of the trademark dispute petition as settled and directed cancellation of the "DUKE" trademark registration in accordance with the parties' Settlement Agreement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Trademark cancellation Trade Mark Registry DUKE trademark

Mr. Chatanya Siddhartha, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

01 Nov 2005 · JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA; 25.01.2019 SANJ... · 2019:DHC:7933-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act once possession is taken and compensation paid, dismissing stale claims of continued possession by landowners.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) 2013 Act possession compensation