Delhi High Court
65,128 judgments
Paritosh Sharma v. UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of promotion, directing the petitioner to first make a representation which the respondent must decide by a speaking order with relevant disclosures.
Hitender Kumar Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a candidate's election eligibility, holding that pending disciplinary proceedings preclude adverse findings in election disputes under the Company Secretaries Act.
Manju Devi v. Premjit Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decree for recovery of Rs. 6,00,000 with interest based on a duly executed loan agreement evidenced by signatures and thumb impression on a revenue-stamped document.
Regen Powertech Private Limited v. Sembcorp Green Infra Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of Section 9 arbitration petitions without hearing and remanded the matter for fresh consideration to uphold principles of natural justice.
Dr. Varunveer v. Financial Commissioner, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a vehicle cannot be confiscated under the Delhi Excise Act if the owner is acquitted and proves lack of involvement or knowledge of the offence for which the vehicle was used.
M/S Hospitech Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. The Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch for MES Works
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting a consultant without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity to be heard violates natural justice and set aside the blacklisting order.
Indraj and Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid nor deposited in court and possession is not taken, declaring the petitioners' land acquisition null and void.
Union of India and Ors. v. Sarita Kapoor
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the absorption of a deputationist to a permanent post, holding that executive orders cannot override statutory recruitment rules and that delay or discrimination in processing absorption applications is impermissible.
Kamlesh and Kamla v. S.D.M.C and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to continue vending at Nehru Place on an interim basis subject to compliance with conditions imposed by the SDMC and approved by the court.
Phool Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is neither paid to landowners nor deposited in court as mandated, and mere deposit in government treasury is insufficient.
Gautam Gambhir v. D.A.P & CO. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit of cricketer Gautam Gambhir seeking injunction against restaurants using the tagline 'by Gautam Gambhir', holding that the defendants lawfully used their own name without causing confusion or misrepresentation.
Twenty First Century Medicare Ltd. v. Rajesh Kukreja
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil appeal by modifying the decree in terms of an amicable settlement where the appellant agreed to pay ₹15 lakhs to the respondent as full and final satisfaction.
Preetinder Singh Thapar v. Hardeep Singh Thapar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a co-owner's suit for pre-emption and cancellation of sale deed in joint family property is maintainable without partition and not barred by limitation where knowledge of sale was concealed, remanding the suit for trial.
Om Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is neither paid nor possession taken, and deposit in government treasury does not suffice as payment under the Land Acquisition Act.
Gyan Chand and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is not paid or deposited in court despite possession being taken, entitling landowners to compensation under the new law.
Dabur India Ltd v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-III
The Delhi High Court upheld transfer pricing adjustments attributing royalty income to Dabur India Ltd. for use of its brand by its wholly owned UAE subsidiary despite absence of a current agreement.
Susheel Kumar Khanna and Anr. v. M/S GSBA Trust and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside the order vacating an interim injunction restraining alienation of trust property, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of disputed documents and applications.
Nandini Pattani & Ors. v. Madhuri Hingorani
The Delhi High Court set aside an order permitting amendment of the plaint without application, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the CPC.
MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD v. VIJAY JAIN & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act, holding that orders passed in commercial suits are not appealable except as specifically provided, and procedural rules on filing evidence do not affect this bar.
Regen Powertech Private Limited v. Sembcorp Green Infra Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of interim relief applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for lack of procedural fairness and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.