Delhi High Court
65,687 judgments
Dhawan Creative Prints Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the provisional attachment powers with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
Swastik Cement Products Pvt Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming that provisional attachment without a charge-sheet is permissible with safeguards and is not arbitrary under Article 14.
J. Sekar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, holding it contains sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness and is essential for urgent provisional attachment of proceeds of crime.
S. Ramachandran v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the power of authorized officers to provisionally attach property involved in money-laundering subject to safeguards and judicial review.
Surendra Kumar Jain and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the power of provisional attachment without a charge-sheet in urgent cases subject to safeguards against arbitrariness.
J Sekar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, holding it contains sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness and does not violate Article 14.
Inderjeet Kaur Raina v. Harvinder Kaur Anand
The Delhi High Court held that a party is entitled to refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 upon settlement of dispute, regardless of the mode or stage of settlement, and allowed refund after withdrawal of appeal due to settlement.
K. Rethinam v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the legality of provisional attachment orders prior to filing of charge-sheet subject to safeguards and judicial review.
K. Rethinam v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the power of provisional attachment with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
S Ramachandran v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming the provisional attachment powers with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
SRS Mining v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming provisional attachment powers with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
T. Vinayak Ravi Reddy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, affirming the scheme of provisional attachment with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
K Rethinam v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, affirming the provisional attachment powers with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
S Ramachandran v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, affirming the provisional attachment powers with safeguards against arbitrariness under Article 14.
SRS Mining v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, affirming the procedural safeguards against arbitrary provisional attachment of property involved in money-laundering.
Pratibha Singh & Anr. v. Joint Director, Enforcement Directorate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA, affirming its safeguards against arbitrariness and allowing provisional attachment of property involved in money laundering prior to charge-sheet filing.
Bharat Deep Sethi v. Sonia Takkar
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's revision petition, holding that leave to defend eviction must be granted where ownership is under judicial challenge, and set aside the eviction order.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meena & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by reducing future prospects to 15% and non-pecuniary damages in line with the Supreme Court's ruling in Pranay Sethi.
Shiv Kumar Pandey v. Gulzar Ahmed & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding additional damages for loss of amenities of life, while upholding the Tribunal's findings on loss of income due to lack of evidence.
Dinesh Prasad Sah v. Yogesh Kaushik & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award of Rs. 6,86,700 to the claimant for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.