Delhi High Court
65,128 judgments
INSTITUTE OF CELLULAR THERAPIES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioners to file statutory applications under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act while allowing uninterrupted continuation of dendritic cell therapy for patients treated before July 2014, balancing regulatory compliance with patient care.
Steel Authority of India Limited v. Designated Authority Directorate General of Anti-Dumping & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of Anti-Dumping Rules, upholding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on graphite electrodes imported from China and affirming the principle that subordinate legislation consistent with the parent statute cannot be struck down after prior adjudication.
M/S MICHIGAN RUBBER (INDIA) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitration award holding the appellant liable for compensation for breach of contract, affirming that uncontested evidence and commercial risks do not excuse contractual performance.
Mohan Meakin Limited v. International Breweries (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failure to consider contract terms and evidence, emphasizing the arbitrator's duty to decide disputes in accordance with the contract under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mohan Meakin Ltd v. International Breweries Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an Interim Award allowing withdrawal of deposited funds by the respondent, holding that an application under Section 17 cannot be converted into an Interim Award under Section 31(6) and that such relief is unsustainable when the final Award is set aside.
Rohit Thakur and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 pending voluntary winding up and consideration under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018, following the precedent set in Rajesh Varma.
Pankaj Jain v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a fresh Section 6 notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued beyond the statutory one-year period after quashing of an earlier notification is invalid, quashing the notifications in question.
Satish Chand v. Rakesh Kumar & Ors.
The High Court set aside the appellate order quashing criminal proceedings initiated on forged documents, holding that delay in appeal was unexplained and criminal trial based on police investigation could not be quashed under Section 341 Cr.P.C.
A B Grain Spirits Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld tender conditions limiting bus service clusters per bidder as reasonable administrative measures promoting competition, dismissing the petition challenging them under Article 14.
Kundan Ram v. Land Acquisition Collector / A.D.M. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid, without deciding the title dispute.
Sarabjit Ahooja v. Parul Rastogi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to recall and cross-examine witnesses after default and delay, subject to payment of costs, emphasizing the court’s discretion under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC to ensure fair trial.
Vidya Sagar v. Subhash Gupta
The High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a possession suit for failure to lead evidence, restoring the suit with costs and a strict timeline for trial.
Komal & Ors. v. Panchi Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree granting possession to the purchaser of property under valid sale documents, rejecting the daughter-in-law's claim to reside in the self-acquired property without title.
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Jitender Munjal
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the DSSSB's shortlisting process and ruled that meritorious reserved category candidates cannot be excluded from unreserved category posts at the shortlisting stage.
Vijay Pal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that no interest is payable on gratuity withheld due to pending departmental and judicial proceedings, and its release after conclusion of such proceedings within a reasonable time does not attract interest liability.
Ashwini Shourie v. Directorate of Estates and Anr.
The Delhi High Court initiated proceedings under Section 340 CrPC against Ashwini Shourie for filing a forged partnership deed and swearing a false affidavit to mislead the court in a property dispute.
Gulvinder Singh v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to respond to the petitioner's claim for arrears under the Sixth Central Pay Commission within a specified time, without deciding on the substantive entitlement.
Prof Ram Bux Jat v. Indira Gandhi National Open University
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent University to decide the petitioner's representation for dearness allowance on pension within twelve weeks, while declining stale claims for leave encashment and travel grant.
Anupama Khanna v. Directorate of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition seeking mandamus for upgrading an adverse ACR and inquiry against a school is premature without formal adverse communication and directed the Directorate of Education to consider the petitioner's representation within twelve weeks.
Binil P.T. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s claim for stepping up of pay on parity with similarly placed teachers, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court and High Court precedents and timely administrative decision-making.