Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Transsnet Music Limited v. Unisys Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that the Single Judge hearing the interim application must consider all issues afresh, including the appellant's intermediary status under the IT Act, without being influenced by prior observations.
Ex-Naik Ajay Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's refusal to grant early hearing, holding that the tribunal's discretion in case prioritization is not subject to judicial interference.
EX CPL RAM KUNWAR v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to reinstitute it including a challenge to the circular dated 1 September 1983.
Shivanand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate for compassionate appointment who attains eligibility age by the time of consideration cannot be denied appointment due to delay caused by authorities and directed appointment with consequential benefits.
Akash Bansal v. Superintendent Range - 109 Central Goods and Services Tax Department, Delhi West, Division
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without explicit notice and objective reasons, setting aside the retrospective cancellation and limiting it to the date of the latest Show Cause Notice.
M/S Jai Durga Industries v. M/S Phool Chand Bhagat Singh
The High Court held that where triable issues exist in a commercial suit under summary procedure, defendants are entitled to unconditional leave to defend without onerous conditions like bank guarantees.
Pranav Ansal & Anr. v. Mahinder Sharma & Anr.
The High Court recalled Non-Bailable Warrants issued by the District Consumer Commission against petitioners, directing their representation through counsel and emphasizing procedural safeguards in execution proceedings.
Sanjay Garg v. M/S Plaza Electrical Products Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant one final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness after closure of evidence to ensure a fair trial without causing undue delay.
Venu Uppal v. Balvinder Uppal
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Santosh Singh v. Satvinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement in a regular suit, restored the defence, and imposed costs on the petitioner.
Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court held that continuous service from temporary appointment before 01.01.2004 followed by regularisation entitles a retired JNU employee to pension under the Old Pension Scheme despite substantive appointment after that date.
Hitesh Mehta v. Priya Mehta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order denying the father's petition for custody of his minor child, emphasizing the child's welfare and emotional security as paramount over financial considerations or parental preference.
Bharat Khanna & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Anil Kumar Sadana & Ors. v. The State of Delhi NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes to prevent abuse of process.
Sartaj v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's request for furlough, setting aside the order rejecting it due to alleged involvement in another offence, emphasizing consideration of bail status and conduct.
Peter Nwalue v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a commercial quantity heroin case under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural irregularities and absence of public witnesses do not justify bail at the pre-trial stage.
Gainda Lal v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging discharge of accused in a dowry harassment and death case, holding that vague allegations without specific evidence and a natural cause of death do not constitute a prima facie offence under Sections 498A and 304B IPC.
Anand Tanwar v. Poonam Anand Tanwar
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintenance order against the petitioner under the DV Act based on his income from all sources but modified the amount due to resumption of cohabitation.
Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. E.M. Services (I) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failure to frame an issue on a properly pleaded counterclaim, holding such omission violates fundamental policy of Indian law and basic notions of justice.
Narender v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused involved in using a child for illicit liquor transportation due to the seriousness of the offence and necessity of custodial interrogation to investigate child exploitation.