Delhi High Court
97,209 judgments
M/S Golden Chariot Recreations Pvt. Ltd. v. Mukesh Panika & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by limitation, holding that successive arbitration notices under the same agreement do not constitute fresh causes of action to extend limitation.
M/S Golden Chariot Recreations Pvt. Ltd. v. Mukesh Panika & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by limitation, holding that no fresh cause of action arose after the earlier dismissal to justify a new arbitration reference.
Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-27, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax assessment and penalty orders for violation of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, considering the COVID-19 lockdown impact.
SDS Infratech Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to provide the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing via video conferencing, holding such hearing is mandated under Section 144B(7) and principles of natural justice.
Ankit Kishan Jalan v. The Principal Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Adjudicating Authority to permit the petitioner to cross-examine witnesses, holding that denial of such opportunity violates natural justice.
Mudassir Habib v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to the petitioner under HPC guidelines, holding that cases investigated by the Crime Branch are not automatically excluded from bail relief if they meet the clarified eligibility criteria.
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED v. KINGS CANYON SEZ PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed the agreed arbitrator to resolve disputes between Tata Consultancy Services and Kings Canyon SEZ Pvt. Ltd., treating Section 9 petitions as Section 17 applications, and disposed of the petitions accordingly.
Shri Prem Prakash Dhawan v. Mr. Aman Dhattarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaint discloses a cause of action and dismissed the defendants' application to reject the suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, affirming the plaintiff's claim of copyright ownership in handwritten Chemistry notes beyond his employment scope.
Pushkarraj Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting a contractual clause conflicting with Section 12(5), to resolve disputes between a construction company and the Union of India.
Anju Jalaj Batra v. National E-Assessment Centre Additional Joint Deputy Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court quashed a faceless assessment order for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a draft assessment order and show cause notice before finalizing assessments.
Riddhima Singh v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition upholding its earlier decision that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition against CBSE and the school located outside Delhi.
Ram Autar v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of notified recruitment rules for aided schools, the general subordinate services rules allowing promotion govern LDC appointments, validating the petitioner’s promotion.
Jatan Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petitioner's repeated applications for land demarcation in accordance with law.
Toplight Corporate Management Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a faceless income tax assessment order for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Section 144B, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a draft assessment order and show-cause notice before finalization.
International Management v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order for failure to issue a mandatory draft assessment order or show cause notice, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 144B procedural safeguards.
Om Prakash Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking retrospective pay scale benefits from 1996 to 1997 on grounds of inordinate delay, laches, and availability of alternate remedies, refusing to extend relief granted to similarly situated employees who pursued claims timely.
CT/GD Vipin Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that allegations of coercion and misuse of service during deputation cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner’s representation regarding restoration on deputation.
Bijender Lakra v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.
Manju Rani v. Shiv Property Dealer
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of a long-pending civil suit, setting a six-month timeline for completion.
NB Sub Muralidharan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to General Court Martial orders on limitation grounds must be pursued before the Armed Forces Tribunal, declining to entertain a writ petition on the same issue.