Delhi High Court
75,184 judgments
Ayush Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a medical re-examination, upholding the Appeal Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit for Indian Air Force recruitment.
Shardhanand and Anr. v. Krishan Pal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Financial Commissioner’s order dismissing a correction application under Section 26 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, holding that such corrections cannot alter substantive rights or pre-consolidation entries and that violation of natural justice does not warrant remand when the application is barred on merits.
Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Review Medical Board’s decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit due to defective colour vision in CAPF recruitment, refusing judicial interference absent mala fide.
Suresh Gulati v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - X & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to decide the petitioner's pending applications for interest on seized amounts under Sections 132B(4)(a) and 244A of the Income Tax Act within six weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Ram Sevak v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a kidnapping and sexual offence case involving a minor, considering the victim's voluntary marriage, completion of investigation, and welfare of their children.
Bharat Chugh v. M C Agrawal HUF
The Delhi High Court held that arbitral proceedings commenced without a valid Section 21 notice are invalid, and accordingly terminated the arbitrator’s mandate for non-compliance with mandatory statutory requirements.
Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to conduct the petitioner’s appellate medical examination at a designated hospital other than AIIMS or Safdarjung Hospital to ensure fairness and allay apprehensions of bias.
Faridabad Implements Private Limited v. MyPreferred Transformation and Hospitality Private Limited
Delhi High Court upheld arbitrator's order directing ₹10 crore security by bank guarantee under Section 17 of Arbitration Act but remitted quantum reconsideration treating the secured amount as ₹15 crores.
Vijay Shukla & Anr. v. Career Launcher Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim arbitral award imposing joint and several liability on trustees of a charitable trust without adjudicating individual liability, emphasizing cautious exercise of interim relief powers under the Arbitration Act.
Deepak Arora v. Rashmi @ Himashi Goel
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered MoU cannot vary a registered relinquishment deed affecting immovable property rights, and a suit based on such an unregistered document filed beyond limitation is liable to be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
All India Backward Classes Federation v. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking automatic disclosure of response sheets and Normalisation Formula details in DSSSB exams, holding that aggrieved candidates must seek information or remedies individually.
M/S.GENIUS PRESENTATION PVT. LTD. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging forfeiture of the Performance Bank Guarantee and debarment from tendering due to non-performance and upheld the validity of verification procedures for "Make in India" content claims.
PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd v. Kavitha Kuruganti
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of PepsiCo’s plant variety registration due to incorrect information and procedural non-compliance under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
M/S Keystone Solutions v. BBQC Hospitality Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer disputes to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator despite the non-existence of the specified LCIA India Arbitration Rules.
Kaushalaya Devi and Ors. v. Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator cannot substantively alter an award post-decision without jurisdiction or notice, arbitration costs must be reasonable, and recovery fees cannot be charged to judgment debtors absent recovery proceedings, ordering refund of excess amounts to the petitioners.
Indraprastha Logisticss Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the benefit of a prior judgment holding that enhanced minimum wages constitute a 'change in law' entitling concessionaires to reimbursement, to the petitioner similarly placed under the Concessionaire Agreement.
Sh. Ram Kumar Shokeen v. Sh. Rajpal Shokeen & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit based on a valid compromise deed executed by the parties, disposing of the suit amicably under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Sandeep Mehta v. Rakesh Arora
The High Court allowed recall and re-examination of the complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to produce admitted documents essential for a just decision, emphasizing the importance of fair trial and judicious exercise of court’s discretionary powers.
Virendra Kumar Awasthi v. Mahender Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree directing the vendor to refund earnest money with interest due to failure to prove clear title and readiness to perform the sale agreement.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that candidates whose recruitment began before 31.12.2003 but were appointed after 01.01.2004 due to administrative delays are entitled to Old Pension Scheme benefits.