Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
Chander Pal Singh v. Shripal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal in a summary suit based on an admitted cheque signature, holding that a defence of a blank cheque misuse is not substantial to grant leave to defend.
M/S Dabur India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a Transfer Pricing Officer's order for lack of reasonable opportunity and directed a fresh hearing with adequate time to respond.
SOTEFIN SA v. INDRAPRASTHA CANCER SOCIETY AND RESEARCH CENTER & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction for patent infringement, holding that minor differences in the alleged infringing product do not preclude infringement under the doctrine of equivalence, and parallel import exemption does not apply to pirated products.
Vijay Kumar Munjal v. Pawan Munjal
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising from family settlement agreements concerning trademark use are arbitrable contractual disputes and directed appointment of arbitrators, rejecting claims of non-arbitrability based on trademark registration rights.
Md. Ehraz Zafar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging monetary eligibility criteria for law firm empanelment on the ground that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the aggrieved parties had access to courts.
Sanjay Chadha Trading as Eveready Tools Emporium v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the IPAB's cancellation of the petitioners' "EVEREADY" trade mark registrations, affirming the respondent's well-known mark status and mala fide adoption by petitioners.
M/S PERFORMANCE MOTORS PVT LTD v. M/S INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a petition for damages under Section 7 of the Public Premises Act is maintainable independently of eviction proceedings, even after withdrawal of the original petition, provided it was instituted prior to such withdrawal.
Bharti P Patel and Ors. v. Mr Harcharan Singh Ranauta and Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondents' failure to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement.
Dr. Lokesh Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings under the CCS Pension Rules cannot be initiated against a contractual appointee whose pension is governed by a separate statutory scheme, quashing the proceedings initiated against the petitioner.
Naresh Chand Tyagi v. Devender Kumar Tyagi
The Delhi High Court held that a typographical error in the cheque number in a Section 138 NI Act complaint does not vitiate proceedings and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the complaint.
Karan Singh Arya v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty of withholding 10% pension for one year imposed on a BIS employee for negligence in submitting market surveillance reports, affirming that pension penalties can be imposed on grounds of proven negligence without a finding of grave misconduct.
Chanchal Goyal v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of petitioners accused of criminal conspiracy and cheating involving sham property transactions and fund rotation orchestrated by a main accused operating from jail.
M/S Ashutosh Builders Contractors and Engineers v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes where the respondent failed to appoint one despite arbitration clause.
Anoop Singh Karayat v. State
The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence of the petitioner during appeal in a conspiracy and evidence tampering case arising from the Uphaar tragedy, holding that conspiracy is a continuing offence and suspension of sentence post-conviction requires compelling reasons.
Arun Pandey & Ors. v. Vikas Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' appeal against the dismissal of their enforcement petition under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that only the award-holder can file such a petition and that the appellants breached their payment obligations under the Settlement Deed.
M/S MDC Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that ESIC's rejection of the petitioner's tender on grounds of differing employer codes and names without proper application of mind was arbitrary, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's bid as technically eligible.
Mahender Kumar Pandey v. Gugan Chand
The Delhi High Court transferred and scheduled for final hearing the suits concerning female Baridars' rights to conduct Puja Sewa and related hereditary and adoption rights at Kalkaji Mandir.
Mahender Kumar Pandey v. Gugan Chand
The Delhi High Court directed urgent listing and hearing of suits concerning the rights of female Baridars to conduct Puja Sewa and related hereditary rights after transferring the cases under Section 24 CPC.
Mahender Kumar Pandey v. Gugan Chand
The Delhi High Court ordered urgent consolidated hearing of suits concerning the rights of female Baridars to conduct Puja Sewa and related hereditary and adoption rights at Kalkaji Mandir.
Mahender Kumar Pandey v. Gugan Chand
The Delhi High Court ordered urgent and consolidated hearing of suits concerning female Baridars' rights to conduct Puja Sewa and related inheritance and adoption issues at Kalkaji Mandir, transferring the cases under Section 24 CPC for effective adjudication.