Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
Bela Goyal Proprietor of Ispat Sangrah (India) v. VIIPL - MIPL JV (Jaipur) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte attachment order obtained through collusion, holding that attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC requires strict compliance and cannot convert unsecured debts into secured claims.
Asian Hotels North Ltd v. Yes Bank Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of all consortium lenders as defendants under Order I Rule 10 CPC to ensure complete adjudication of a loan restructuring dispute involving multiple parties.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. VHM (Varsha Health Medicine) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on an early settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and allowed full refund of court fees following the Supreme Court's liberal interpretation of settlement provisions.
India Power Corporation Limited v. Eastern Coalfields Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting IPCL's claim for maintenance expenses and affirmed ECL's entitlement to rent for unlawful possession of the power plant after lease expiry.
Frankfinn Entertainment Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Unisys Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff owns the YouTube Suit Channel, restrained defendant No.1 from interfering with plaintiff's content, and directed restoration, revenue disclosure, and handover of control.
Uniworld Garden Apartment Owners Association v. Sandeep Kwatra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of an apartment owners association seeking impleadment in execution proceedings for auction of a shop, holding that the association had no ownership rights over the shop excluded from common areas under the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act.
DASPR PIPES PVT LTD v. TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD
The Delhi High Court directed Tata Power to grant electricity connection upon the petitioner removing hazardous obstructions and furnishing an undertaking to maintain safe distance from high tension cables.
Ashwani v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that a charge-sheet filed without the FSL voice sample report is complete if core evidence is available, and thus default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is not warranted.
SETH PROPERTIES v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to permit inspection and provide digital copies of specified property tax assessment lists to the petitioner, balancing transparency with practical concerns.
Gautam Thapar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Gautam Thapar in a PMLA money laundering case, holding that the twin conditions under Section 45(1) PMLA apply and the gravity of the offence and flight risk warranted denial of bail.
Siddhartha Thomas v. Council of Architecture & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a four-year M.A. (Hons.) in Architecture from University of Edinburgh is not automatically recognized as a qualifying degree under the Architects Act, 1972, directing the petitioner to submit detailed information for assessment and recommendation under the statutory process.
Saisons Trade and Industry Private Limited v. Maithri Aquatech Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over a patent infringement suit filed against defendants conducting business through an interactive website and having agents in Delhi, allowing the suit to proceed in Delhi.
Ravinder Parkash Punj v. Neeraj Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to the extent of directing expedited trial proceedings with fixed timelines for filing evidence and concluding the suit by 31.05.2022.
Dhawlendu v. Ms Vasudha Mishra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a contempt petition against UPSC for non-compliance of EWS reservation orders, holding that contempt cannot lie while the matter is pending before the Supreme Court.
Raj Singh Gehlot v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a PMLA economic offence case, balancing personal liberty against public interest and clarifying the applicability of Section 45(1) PMLA post-2018 amendment.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. M/S Shugan Chandra Kothari Trust
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT's order, holding that the Assessing Officer's original assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial, and the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was rightly not invoked.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt Sarita Nayak Mukherjee & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation for a fatal motor accident caused by the negligent driver of a Trolla, including dependency of the deceased's physically handicapped father and loss of consortium.
Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Frost Falcon Distilleries Limited
The Delhi High Court held that while the defendant's 'CASINOS PRIDE' mark does not infringe the plaintiff's registered trademarks, a prima facie case of passing off exists, granting an interim injunction against the defendant.
Rohit Shukla v. DGMS (Army)
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging an appointment on grounds of non-joinder of the concerned employee, unexplained delay, and non-maintainability of PIL in pure service matters.
Gammon Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional Performance Bank Guarantee cannot be restrained from encashment merely due to contractual disputes or reduction in contract value, dismissing the petitioner’s injunction plea.