Delhi High Court
72,289 judgments
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court ordered eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises under court supervision after occupants refused offered alternative accommodations, while permitting temporary shops pending redevelopment and ensuring essential services during the Navratras festival.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court ordered eviction of unauthorized occupants from Kalkaji Mandir premises after they refused rehabilitation options, directing coordinated action for eviction, temporary commercial arrangements, and essential services during the Navratras festival.
Kishan v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of kidnapping and sexual offences against a minor, holding that the minor's consent is legally immaterial but bail is justified given the circumstances and completion of investigation.
Akash Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that serious allegations and prima facie evidence preclude bail despite the petitioner’s claims of innocence and parity with co-accused.
Martin Chikamma Nwokorie v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court rejected bail to the accused in a commercial heroin trafficking case under the NDPS Act, holding that prima facie evidence and statutory embargo preclude bail absent exceptional circumstances.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's COVID-19 extension of limitation applies to trademark oppositions, directed CGPDTM to accept late oppositions filed during the pandemic, and suspended registrations issued without considering such oppositions.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court’s extension of limitation applies to trademark oppositions, directed CGPDTM to accept delayed oppositions filed during the pandemic, and suspended certain registration certificates pending opposition decisions.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension applies to trademark oppositions, directing the CGPDTM to accept delayed oppositions and suspend registrations issued without considering them.
Jyoti Yadav v. Neeraj Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on grounds of mental cruelty caused by unsubstantiated allegations and false complaints made by the wife against the husband and his family.
Mawasi Ram v. Tej Ram Sharma & Ors.
The High Court held that a first appellate court cannot decide the merits of an appeal once it has held the appeal not maintainable, quashing the order dismissing the appeal on merits.
National Highways Authority of India v. Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to permit tendering during arbitration proceedings while staying consequences of contract termination pending the arbitral tribunal's decision on interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sushma Chopra v. Neelu Bisaria & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Article 227, it will not interfere with a trial court’s procedural direction requiring the petitioner to file affidavit evidence within a time frame despite a pending forensic report, emphasizing the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction.
Lalit Kumar Jain & Anr. v. Vistra ITCL India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mandatory injunctions to raise finances over project assets require detailed proposals and protection of secured creditors' rights, directing the trial court to consider such applications accordingly.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court’s extension of limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic applies to trademark oppositions, directed acceptance of delayed oppositions, suspended certain registrations, and censured CGPDTM officials for non-disclosure.
Sunita v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a minor trafficking and sexual exploitation case, emphasizing contradictions in evidence and imposing strict bail conditions.
Anil Kumar @ Nillu v. State
Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in an NDPS case after nearly eight years of custody, applying Supreme Court directions on bail entitlement due to prolonged trial delay and upholding the right to speedy trial under Article 21.
Basanti Devi Mehra v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking police action for harassment and property dispute, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory remedy under Section 156(3) CrPC before invoking writ jurisdiction.
NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY v. GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of patent infringement pleadings to add additional claims and infringing devices but held that new patents require a fresh suit, balancing procedural flexibility with fairness.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Imperial Housing Ventures P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of additions under Section 69C where purchases were genuine and payments made through banking channels despite non-traceability of sellers during search proceedings.
Imagine Marketing Private Limited v. M/S Green Accessories
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in favor of the plaintiff against non-appearing defendants for unauthorized use of the 'BOAT' mark, awarding injunction, damages, and delivery up of counterfeit goods without requiring ex parte evidence.