Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
Dr. Khundongbam Chetan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a medical seat cannot be considered vacant or reallotted after the second counselling round if the candidate does not resign within the stipulated time, dismissing the petition seeking admission on that basis.
Shanti Devi v. BSES Yamuna Power Limited
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Yamuna Power Limited to grant a fresh electricity connection to the petitioner without requiring landlord's NOC despite a pending possession dispute, subject to payment of dues and compliance with formalities.
Shreya Yadav v. National Testing Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking directions to secure NEET OMR sheets, holding that unsubstantiated apprehensions without evidence do not warrant judicial intervention.
Vishal Balguer v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a brutal murder case, holding that long custody and minor discrepancies do not justify bail where the offence is serious and evidence prima facie establishes guilt.
Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. v. M/S Deepak and Co.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award ruling that the respondent was not obliged to provide a welcome drink before accepting a policy change and that IRCTC must reimburse GST paid on production charges upon proof of payment.
Karida Real Estates Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings initiated against a non-existent company and directed fresh consideration after due compliance with natural justice.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma & Anr. v. Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana
The Delhi High Court set aside trial court summons under Section 211(7) of the Companies Act, 1956 for failure to consider limitation and condonation of delay applications, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Sheikh Ishrafil v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ petition seeking to restrain police investigation into the Jahangir Puri riots, holding that lawful police investigations cannot be obstructed under the guise of protecting fundamental rights.
Nimit Kumar v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty of pay reduction imposed on a CISF officer for proven misconduct, finding no procedural irregularity or disproportionate punishment.
Murari Mirchandani v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the SDM’s notice under Section 145 Cr.P.C. for desealing property, holding that such proceedings cannot be revived while civil suits on title and possession are pending without emergent grounds.
Pankaj Saini v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an invalid Section 148 notice and assessment order due to lack of prior recording of reasons to believe but allowed the tax authorities to proceed with a subsequent valid notice.
Jai Bhagwan Sharma v. Munni Devi
The Delhi High Court held that wilful disobedience of a consent decree and breach of undertaking to vacate premises constitute contempt of court, ordering the respondent's eviction and sentencing proceedings.
CGMP Projects Pvt Ltd v. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid in a government tender, holding that expert technical evaluation is not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
The Chief Executive Officer J and K Era Srinagar Kashmir v. Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the 120-day limitation period under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the petitioner's contention to apply the Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration Act.
Sumit Aneja v. Gursimran Kaur
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to decide the petitioner's application for early hearing in a child custody matter promptly, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal while respecting the trial court's discretion.
M/S WEARWELL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR FALAM AHMED
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned appellate order under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, applying the principle of parity with earlier similar petitions.
HEETICH MARKETING-UND VERTRIEBS GMBH & CO. KG. & Anr. v. GUPTA STORE
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, permanently restraining the defendant from selling counterfeit 'HETTICH' products, confirming that summary judgment is appropriate where no real prospect of defense exists in trademark infringement suits.
Avneet Kaur v. Sadhu Singh
The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts have jurisdiction over suits arising out of a marital relationship even if the parties are not spouses, and ordered transfer of a suit between parents-in-law and daughter-in-law to the Family Court.
Jaswant Singh v. Komal Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld the executing court's jurisdiction to adjudicate disputed ownership and fraud allegations during execution proceedings under Order XXI CPC, dismissing the petition challenging the framing of issues and evidence recording.
M/S KANISHKA IMPEX PVT LTD v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive recovery of property tax dues pending the functioning of the Municipal Taxation Tribunal, directing the petitioner to continue paying tax as per the base year and pursue the appeal thereafter.