Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

D. Raja Shekhar v. Government of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2458-DB

The Delhi High Court held that caste certificates issued by other States have pan-India validity for reservation in Delhi recruitments, overruling the Tribunal's reliance on Subhash Chandra and directing implementation of the S. Pushpa and Bir Singh judgments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant caste certificate reservation Scheduled Caste pan-India validity

Fresenius Medical Care India Private Limited v. Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited

04 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:2489

The Delhi High Court held that a deed of subrogation-cum-assignment does not extinguish the assured's right to arbitrate, allowing appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes despite insurance settlement.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant subrogation assignment arbitration arbitral tribunal

Amit Gupta v. State & Anr.

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2402

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420/406/34 IPC based on a bona fide settlement between the parties, holding that acceptance of the settlement amount precludes continuation of criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR settlement agreement Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC

Bharat v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2394

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of two appellants for acid attack under Section 326-A/34 IPC, affirming that circumstantial evidence and victim's statements proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite minor contradictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acid attack Section 326-A IPC burden of proof Section 106 Evidence Act

National Highway Authority of India v. M/s IRB Ahmedabad Vadodra Super Express Tollways Pvt. Ltd.

04 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2022:DHC:2377

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the interim arbitral award on preliminary issues regarding competing road definition and premium deferment, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 interim arbitral award competing road

Satya Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council

04 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:2500

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing NDMC to regularize the shop licence in the petitioner's name, holding she is liable only for enhanced licence fees from 2002 with interest from demand dates, not for arrears prior to her possession.

property petition_allowed Significant licence fee arrears subletting partnership dissolution NDMC policy 1999

SAPPHIRE MEDIA SERVICES v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

04 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:2499

The Delhi High Court upheld the SDMC’s notices directing removal of advertisements displayed under a concession agreement that violated the Supreme Court-approved Outdoor Advertising Policy, 2017, emphasizing strict compliance with policy terms including contract duration and prior permissions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Outdoor Advertising Policy 2017 concession agreement advertisement rights municipal corporation

B D Khanna Publicity v. Jalveen Rosha

04 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2383

The Delhi High Court held that strict compliance with Section 27(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act is mandatory for deposit of rent with the Rent Controller, rejected tenant's bona fide doubt claim due to attornment, and allowed deposit for October-November 2020 but disallowed it for December 2020-May 2021.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1957 Section 27(1) deposit of rent tenant's bona fide doubt

Harikala & Ors. v. State

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2395

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants under the NDPS Act due to failure of prosecution to prove chain of custody of seized contraband and non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act chain of custody seizure and search

Neeraj Bhatt v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2390

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and raping a minor, ruling that the prosecutrix's consent was immaterial given her age proven by birth records.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant minor consent immaterial proof of age birth certificate kidnapping

Ramjan alias Pagla v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2388

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of three appellants for gang rape and robbery, affirming that credible eyewitness testimony and dock identification suffice even without Test Identification Parade or DNA evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Gang rape Burglary

Ramjan alias Pagla v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2387

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for gang rape and robbery, ruling that eyewitness identification in court is reliable even without Test Identification Parade and that absence of DNA or fingerprint matches does not negate credible prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Sexual assault Robbery

SBI General Insurance Co Ltd v. Surendra Kumar Singh & Ors.

04 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:2495

The Delhi High Court upheld insurer liability for a fatal accident caused by a negligently stationary tractor-trolley, dismissed contributory negligence claims against the deceased, and enhanced compensation including loss of consortium.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence contributory negligence insurance liability

Bharat v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2392

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 11-year sentence of two appellants for acid attack based on credible victim testimony, circumstantial evidence, and failure to explain incriminating facts under Section 106 Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acid attack Section 326-A IPC Section 106 Evidence Act circumstantial evidence

Cement Corporation of India Ltd. v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

04 Jul 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:2472-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting interest on dues despite a rehabilitation scheme under SICA, holding that absence of express prohibition in the scheme permits such interest awards and limits judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Sanctioned Scheme Arbitral award

Dalip Kumar Saluja v. Vijay Kumar Saluja

04 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2450

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 24 CPC to consolidate two suits involving the same property to avoid contradictory decisions and ensure judicial economy.

civil appeal_allowed Section 24 CPC transfer of suit civil suit contradictory decisions

Central Bureau of Investigation v. S Eswara Reddy & Ors.

04 Jul 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:2411

The Delhi High Court upheld denial of extended police custody remand for most accused in a corruption case, allowing further interrogation in judicial custody, but granted limited police custody to one accused brought on transit remand.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police custody remand Section 167(2) CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act custodial interrogation

Rani Devi Jeswani & Ors. v. Seema Haroon

04 Jul 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2404

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for possession in a residential tenancy dispute, holding that statutory tenancy protection is not heritable unless heirs resided with and were dependent on the tenant, and that the tenancy was residential despite incidental commercial use.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory tenancy Delhi Rent Control Act residential tenancy commercial tenancy

Stephen v. State

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2401

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of two appellants for heroin possession under the NDPS Act while acquitting a third due to inadmissibility of his confessional statement under Section 67 NDPS Act, clarifying evidentiary and procedural requirements under the Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS Act confessional statement Section 52A NDPS Act

Stephen v. State

04 Jul 2022 · Mukta Gupta · 2022:DHC:2400

Delhi High Court upheld convictions of two appellants for heroin possession under NDPS Act while acquitting one appellant due to inadmissibility of confessional statement under Section 67 NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS Act confessional statement Section 52A NDPS Act