Delhi High Court
70,895 judgments
Jiya Lal and Others v. Manav Bharti India International School
The High Court held that Labour Court under Section 33 C(2) Industrial Disputes Act cannot adjudicate disputed entitlement claims and dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of arrears computation.
Theos Food Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Theobroma Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement between Theos and Theobroma resolving trademark disputes over 'THEOS' and 'THEOBROMA' marks with territorial and usage restrictions.
Devender Pal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees promoted to ASI rank on or after 01.01.2006 are entitled to pay fixation at not less than the entry pay fixed for direct recruits, directing re-fixation with arrears and interest.
Dr Ajay Chhabra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim participation in an interview due to age limit issues, upholding a Tribunal's consent order directing disposal of the petitioner's representation.
Dinesh Jhunjhunwala v. Citixsys Technologies Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a company petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, holding that the petitioner must be given an opportunity to inspect and challenge the register of members before maintainability is denied on membership grounds.
Neetu Rani & Ors. v. Kishan Devi @ Kishori Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as abated due to the appellants' failure to substitute the deceased respondent despite multiple opportunities.
Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation-1, New Delhi v. Air India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act does not override the beneficial provisions of a DTAA, allowing tax deduction at source at the lower DTAA rate even if the non-resident payee lacks PAN.
TCG Media Limited v. Maxposure Media Group India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed the sole arbitrator under the valid arbitration agreement to adjudicate disputes arising from the Business Transfer Agreement, leaving issues of limitation and pendency to be decided by the arbitrator.
Dinesh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on consistent and credible testimonies of injured child witnesses corroborated by medical evidence and motive.
MEGALOGIX v. ST.MARTINS DIOCESAN SCHOOL
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a two-member tribunal clause is invalid and the respondent's failure to appear permits such appointment.
NAYATlHEALTHCARE AND RESEARCH PVT LTD v. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed arbitration petitions as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between Nayati Healthcare and Kotak Mahindra Prime.
Ramesh Nath Sharma v. Raj Nath Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 522-day delay in filing it, holding that vague reasons like illness and pandemic do not justify such inordinate delay without specific explanation.
M/S Leo Cargo Services v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that the 90-day timeline for submission of the Inquiry Report under Regulation 20(5) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 is mandatory, and delay beyond this period invalidates the revocation proceedings against a customs broker.
Padam Kumar Dagar v. The State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of financial fraud under the Land Pooling Policy, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and parity with co-accused already on bail.
Sh. Harish Singh Rawat v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging the dismissal of his Original Application by the Tribunal, granting liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal.
Daljit Singh Sumbrya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to decide the petitioner’s claim for increments and pay scale benefits in accordance with a prior coordinate bench judgment.
Novartis A G & Anr. v. Supermax Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from manufacturing or selling patented Nilotinib during the patent term based on their bid submissions indicating infringement.
S Chand and Company Ltd v. Preeti Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court approved a settlement restraining defendants from using the author's name and branding in competing publications, enforcing publishing agreement terms and preventing misleading representations.
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities
The Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 cannot issue binding directions for retrospective promotions, and such orders are only recommendatory.
Bakshi Mohemmed Riyazuddin v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under the Arms Act against a petitioner for mere possession of ammunition without conscious knowledge, emphasizing that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability under the Arms Act.