Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

The National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Sanjaida & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4728

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act for an employee murdered while performing employment duties, holding such death arises out of and in the course of employment and dismissing the insurer's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act employer-employee relationship death during course of employment murder of employee

Deepak Kapoor v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, New Delhi & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4724-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment on the ground of mere change of opinion regarding valuation and expenses is impermissible, setting aside the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Reopening of assessment

Neha Datta v. Capitol Art House Pvt Ltd

09 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5018-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the trial court's refusal to admit a CD as evidence due to unexplained delay, upholding the trial court's discretion to prevent undue trial delay.

civil appeal_dismissed admission of evidence delay in trial discretion of trial court late evidence

Dr. Suboohi Irshad and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4883-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Tribunal to expedite disposal of the petition challenging UNANI Assistant Professor recruitment and extended interim protection against implementation of results till then.

administrative appeal_dismissed recruitment process Assistant Professor UNANI interim protection expeditious disposal

Brijesh Gupta v. Saroj Gupta

09 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4774
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an attorney holder can file and verify pleadings and instruct counsel on behalf of a party, and that pleadings containing facts within an attorney's knowledge do not warrant striking out under Order VI Rule 16 CPC, while remanding procedural applications for fresh consideration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 16 CPC Power of Attorney Attorney holder Striking out pleadings

Shubham Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4749-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a petitioner disqualified for a tattoo on the saluting hand to remove it and undergo fresh medical examination for appointment in armed forces.

administrative other medical fitness tattoo armed forces recruitment uniform guidelines

Suresh Kumar v. CP & Ors.

09 Nov 2022 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD · 2022:DHC:4763-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police constable for corruption, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental enquiries where findings are supported by tangible evidence and proper procedure is followed.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry disciplinary proceedings judicial review tangible evidence

M/S PAM COSMETICS AND GLASSES PVT. LTD v. VEIRA PERSONALCARE PVT LTD

09 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5883
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a change in the respondent company's name does not invalidate a Section 21 notice and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, referring the dispute to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 21 notice arbitration agreement change of company name

Mahender Chawla v. State

04 Nov 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:4980

Bail was denied to the accused in a large-scale cheating and misappropriation case due to the gravity of offences and risk of absconding despite prolonged custody and completed investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. cheating misappropriation

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Suraj Mal

04 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4699

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating the employee with 50% back wages, holding that back wages are discretionary and the 'No work No pay' principle does not apply to illegal termination.

labor petition_dismissed Significant illegal termination back wages reinstatement no work no pay

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lokesh Gupta & Ors.

04 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4698

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the future prospects addition from 50% to 40% in line with Supreme Court precedent, allowing the insurer's appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Future Prospects Compensation Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Pankaj Saini v. State and Anr.

04 Nov 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4990

The Delhi High Court held that valid school and matriculation records conclusively determine the victim's age, negating the need for an ossification test under the POCSO Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant POCSO Act age determination ossification test juvenile justice act

VIDYADHARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR.

04 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 171 (2010) DLT 459

The Delhi High Court upheld the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE for non-compliance with built-up area norms, invalid building completion certificate, and faculty qualification requirements under applicable regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NCTE recognition withdrawal built-up area requirement Building Completion Certificate faculty qualifications

MS AMAN ENGINEERING WORKS v. REGISTRAR TRADE MARKS, TRADE MARKS REGISTRY, NEW DELHI & ANR.

04 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:4701

The Delhi High Court held that the Registrar of Trade Marks cannot condone delay beyond the prescribed period under Rule 119 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, and set aside orders allowing review applications filed after 16-17 years as barred by limitation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Trade Marks Rules, 2017 Rule 119 Section 131

Avery Dennison Corporation v. Controller of Patents and Designs

04 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4697
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Controller's refusal of a patent for a 'Notched Fastener', holding that the invention involves a non-obvious inventive step and merits patent grant.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant inventive step patent refusal notched fastener obviousness

Bell Finvest India Limited & Ors. v. A U Small Finance Bank Limited

04 Nov 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2022:DHC:4654
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes between a financial institution borrower and a bank lender under the SARFAESI Act are non-arbitrable and dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act section 11 arbitration non-arbitrability financial institution borrower

Welcome Shoes Private Limited v. Retro Footwears Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

04 Nov 2022 · Jyoti Singh

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement in a trademark dispute involving 'PURE' and 'WELCOME' marks, disposing of the suit and connected petitions with binding undertakings and withdrawal of impugned trademark applications.

intellectual_property settled Trademark infringement Trade Marks Act 1999 Settlement Decree

Axis Trustee Services Limited v. Brij Bhushan Singal & Anr.

04 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:4656
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors of a corporate debtor lie before the NCLT and the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC stays pending suits against such guarantors from the date of filing the insolvency application.

civil other Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 60 IBC Section 95 IBC Section 96 IBC

M/S ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SAROJ GAUTAM & ORS

04 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4653

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, upholding the award of death compensation based on admitted employer-employee relationship and valid insurance coverage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 appeal employer-employee relationship death compensation

Ajay Kumar Mittal v. UOI & Ors.

04 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4642

The Delhi High Court held that philatelic exhibits over 75 years old qualify as antiquities under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972, and are subject to export regulations and guidelines applicable to antiquities.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Philatelic exhibits Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 Antiquities definition Temporary Export Permit