Delhi High Court
61,904 judgments
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Shyam Lal & Others
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award granting reinstatement and back wages to a terminated worker, holding that wages paid under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act constitute adequate compensation in absence of proof of employment.
GSP Crop Science Pvt Ltd v. BR Agrotech Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court decreed the patent infringement suit between GSP Crop Science and BR Agrotech based on a settlement acknowledging patent validity and granting permanent injunctions under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Dablu @ Suraj v. State (N.C.T) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order summoning additional witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C., ruling that procedural technicalities cannot bar examination of essential witnesses not named in the charge sheet in a State prosecution.
Dore Realtors Private Limited v. ICICI Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously hear the mortgagor’s challenge to an auction sale, granting interim relief to prevent confirmation of the sale pending adjudication.
Utkarsh Mittal v. Maulana Azad Medical College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking admission to a postgraduate medical course after completion of all counselling rounds, holding that no admissions can be granted beyond the prescribed schedule to preserve merit and academic integrity.
Partha Sarathi Saha v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court upheld that security personnel employed through a contractor and paid from the establishment’s accounts are employees under the EPF Act, dismissing the appellant’s challenge to coverage under the Act.
Dr Samir Kumar Das v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-extension of a contractual CMD's tenure due to pending vigilance proceedings, holding that extension is discretionary and relieving orders upon tenure expiry are administrative acts not requiring inquiry.
Manmohan Kapani v. Kapani Resorts Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 9 petition for interim relief in arbitration proceedings, holding that only courts at the Mumbai seat of arbitration have exclusive jurisdiction under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act.
Ms. Ilaria Kapur v. Rakesh Kapur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected a partition suit by a minor daughter claiming coparcenary rights in HUF properties, holding that the HUF stood dissolved before her birth and the properties devolved individually upon the defendants under the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005.
Nadeem Chaudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that the presumption under Section 304B IPC cannot be invoked at the bail stage without evidence of cruelty soon before death.
Amit Thapliyal v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving his minor daughter, emphasizing careful scrutiny of evidence and statutory presumption under Section 29 without accepting prosecution case as gospel truth.
Mamta Nagpal v. State of GNCTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of FIR registration under Section 156(3) CrPC, holding that the complaint did not disclose a cognizable offence warranting police investigation.
National Building Construction Corpn. Ltd & Anr v. G R G Construction Company
The Delhi High Court recorded a valid settlement between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, decreed the suit accordingly, and ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
National Building Construction Corpn. Ltd & Anr v. G R G Construction Company
The Delhi High Court recorded a valid settlement between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, decreed the suit accordingly, and ordered refund of court fees paid by the plaintiff.
Roshan Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a POCSO case after considering contradictions in evidence, the stage of trial, and absence of risk of tampering or flight, applying the presumption under Section 29 POCSO with appropriate safeguards.
Dilip Singh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed demolition orders based on demarcation without hearing, directing personal hearing and opportunity to challenge encroachment findings before final orders.
Satish Kumar Jain v. Brahm Prakash & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XV-A CPC, courts have discretion to direct unauthorized occupants to deposit reasonable mesne profits during suit pendency even without admission of amount, and allowed the appellant's appeal directing such deposit.
Demas Developers Private Limited v. ICICI Bank Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously hear the mortgagor's case before confirmation of auction sale to prevent irreparable prejudice, without granting interim stay.
Alvita Realtors Private Limited v. ICICI Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's challenge to the auction of mortgaged property to prevent irreparable prejudice, without staying the auction sale.
Nuray Realtech Private Limited v. ICICI Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to expeditiously hear the mortgagor's challenge to an auction sale to prevent irreparable prejudice, without confirming the sale at this stage.