Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Ranjeet Singh v. Uttam Chand Deceased Through LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld the revival of an execution petition for a decree upheld by the Supreme Court, ruling that the executing court had jurisdiction and the procedure under Order 45 Rule 15 CPC was not mandatory in this context.
Debasis Mohapatra v. Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank)
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty of compulsory retirement imposed on a bank officer, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental inquiries where procedure and evidence are proper.
Tanish Parcha v. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti
The Delhi High Court allowed a minor petitioner to continue studies at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya despite initial admission denial, emphasizing the child's welfare and uninterrupted education.
Nasir Ahmad v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits as the issue was already decided in a prior batch of petitions.
Burger King Company LLC v. Virendra Kumar Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay on the operation of a respondent's trademark registration identical to the petitioner's well-known BURGER KING mark, finding prima facie dishonest adoption and likelihood of confusion.
Asha Bhalla v. Revenue Assistant/ SDM & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a vesting and ejectment order under the Delhi Land Reforms Act as the land had been urbanized, rendering the Act inapplicable post-urbanization.
Ram Chand v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding his transfer within a specified time, without interfering with the transfer orders themselves.
Padam Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Section 307 IPC case after considering the hostile testimony of the complainant and the long custody period, subject to stringent conditions.
versus
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' appeal and set aside the trial court's dismissal of condonation of delay in filing the written statement, holding that the Supreme Court's suspension of limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic applies to such delays.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mangal Shah & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an injured claimant traveling as owner/authorized representative of goods in a goods vehicle is covered under the insurance policy, upheld 50% functional disability, enhanced future prospects addition to 40%, and increased compensation accordingly.
Chaudhary Hitesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending revision petition within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition seeking reinstatement after removal from service.
Virender Kumar Gupta v. Burger King Corporation and Anr.
Rectification petitions filed after a trademark infringement suit are not maintainable without a prior civil court finding of prima facie tenability of the invalidity plea.
Jagmeet Singh Bhatia v. Anay Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitrator's fee fixation with party consent and dismissed the petitioner's plea for a new arbitrator and fee fixation as per Schedule IV, emphasizing the binding nature of consensual fee agreements and the prospective application of Supreme Court guidelines.
Dinesh Chander v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's reasoned summoning order against a contractor accused of negligence causing worker deaths, dismissing the petition to quash the order under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Tarsem Singh v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time, without adjudicating the merits of the transfer.
Kulwant Singh v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding his transfer within a specified time, without adjudicating on the merits of the transfer orders.
Ram Ratan Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging premature recall of officers deputed abroad, holding that the Office Memorandum requiring advance notice does not apply to such deputations.
Seema Devi v. Shree Ranjit Kumar Bhagat
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte divorce decree, holding that summons were duly served, the appellant had notice of the hearing, and the respondent's remarriage was lawful under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
ANTONY RAOD TRANSPORT SOULUTION PVT LTD v. VARSHA JOSHI
The Delhi High Court held government respondents guilty of contempt for wilfully disobeying clear directions to amend payment formulas separately for each cluster under concessionaire agreements following minimum wage increases.
Ms. Pallavi Awasthi & Ms. Apurva Singh, Advocates. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to a discharged Indian Air Force employee joining a central government post, in line with established precedents and pension rules.