Delhi High Court
94,461 judgments
UNO MINDA LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Collector of Stamps to adjudicate and communicate stamp duty payable within 30 days, ensuring time-bound delivery of services under the Indian Stamp Act and Delhi law.
Conference for Human Rights (India) v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents are performing their statutory duties of sterilizing and immunizing stray dogs under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, and dismissed the petitions seeking further directions.
Union of India v. JWO Dusyant Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order granting disability pension for hypertension detected during military service, affirming the presumption of service attribution and placing the burden on the establishment to disprove it.
Niharika v. Vikas Rajora
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to transfer a family court case from Patiala House to Karkardooma Family Court following no objection from the respondent.
JMD Heritage Lawns Private Limited v. Mr. Ankit Chawla Proprietor Sadda Pind Restaurant
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in its earlier judgment to accurately reflect the defendant's undertaking regarding withdrawal of a trademark application.
Faraz Khan @ Babloo v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for interim bail on medical grounds, holding that the petitioner was receiving adequate medical treatment in jail and no urgent necessity for release was established.
Naveen @ Pelu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Section 304 IPC case, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for prima facie satisfaction before denying bail in serious offences.
Manish Choudhary v. Chairman Indian Red Cross Society & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's order and directed the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order before the Tribunal.
Bell Finvest (India) Limited & Ors. v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award enforcing full loan repayment, holding that the arbitrator's interpretation was plausible and no procedural prejudice or bias was established.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. The P.O., Yad Ram
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized absence, even if recorded as leave without pay, constitutes misconduct warranting dismissal approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's contrary award.
Yad Ram Conductor v. DTC
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award dismissing a workman for unauthorized absence, holding that Section 10 proceedings are independent of Section 33(2)(b) approval and that the enquiry and dismissal were valid.
Union Bank of India v. Vijay Pal
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to serve the defendant, granting the plaintiff an opportunity to effect service by ordinary or substituted means under CPC.
Priyash Bhargava & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary mutual settlement and dissolution of marriage, emphasizing the court's duty to encourage amicable resolutions under section 482 CrPC.
ARDENT INFO SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. v. PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner's income tax appeal was pending on the specified date under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, setting aside rejection orders and directing acceptance of declarations.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Pureca Laboratories Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, holding that Pureca Laboratories infringed the registered trademark 'NISE' and awarded damages and costs accordingly.
Pankaj Bhargava v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition against Air India Limited on maintainability grounds post-privatization, holding that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to privatized entities no longer controlled by the government.
Poonam Dinesh Singh v. CMD Air India and Another
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable against Air India post-privatization, but liabilities remain with the company and the petitioner may pursue other remedies.
Ranjeet Singh v. Uttam Chand Deceased Through LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld the revival of an execution petition for a decree upheld by the Supreme Court, ruling that the executing court had jurisdiction and the procedure under Order 45 Rule 15 CPC was not mandatory in this context.
Debasis Mohapatra v. Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank)
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty of compulsory retirement imposed on a bank officer, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental inquiries where procedure and evidence are proper.
Tanish Parcha v. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti
The Delhi High Court allowed a minor petitioner to continue studies at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya despite initial admission denial, emphasizing the child's welfare and uninterrupted education.