Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Jagmeet Singh Bhatia v. Anay Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitrator's fee fixation with party consent and dismissed the petitioner's plea for a new arbitrator and fee fixation as per Schedule IV, emphasizing the binding nature of consensual fee agreements and the prospective application of Supreme Court guidelines.
Dinesh Chander v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's reasoned summoning order against a contractor accused of negligence causing worker deaths, dismissing the petition to quash the order under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Tarsem Singh v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time, without adjudicating the merits of the transfer.
Kulwant Singh v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding his transfer within a specified time, without adjudicating on the merits of the transfer orders.
Ram Ratan Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging premature recall of officers deputed abroad, holding that the Office Memorandum requiring advance notice does not apply to such deputations.
Seema Devi v. Shree Ranjit Kumar Bhagat
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte divorce decree, holding that summons were duly served, the appellant had notice of the hearing, and the respondent's remarriage was lawful under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
ANTONY RAOD TRANSPORT SOULUTION PVT LTD v. VARSHA JOSHI
The Delhi High Court held government respondents guilty of contempt for wilfully disobeying clear directions to amend payment formulas separately for each cluster under concessionaire agreements following minimum wage increases.
Ms. Pallavi Awasthi & Ms. Apurva Singh, Advocates. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to a discharged Indian Air Force employee joining a central government post, in line with established precedents and pension rules.
Shreyansh Sharma v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court upheld the University's 'no rank violation' policy in special spot offline counseling, dismissing the petition challenging merit-based admission restrictions despite vacant seats.
Glaxo Group Limited v. Naresh Goel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a court-mediated settlement where the defendants ceased infringing use and agreed to specific undertakings regarding the disputed marks and packaging.
Ajay Khera v. State of GNCTD
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a senior citizen accused in a multi-crore economic offence case after finding the investigation complete and no specific risk of tampering or flight.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Prince
The Delhi High Court held that courts must exercise judicial restraint and avoid directing or monitoring police disciplinary actions through repeated orders and adverse remarks, which amount to judicial overreach.
Sonal Aggarwal alias Sonal Sharma v. Vishal Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance granted under Domestic Violence proceedings does not bar a fresh maintenance claim under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.
Refrigerated Water Licensees Association v. Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking a ban on sale of contaminated water and harmful drinks by unlicensed hawkers, holding that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has been taking adequate enforcement action and must continue to do so.
Chetan v. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi High Court directs a fresh independent medical examination for a BSF recruitment candidate declared medically unfit, with the final report binding and appointment under EWS quota if found fit.
Sasi Kumar P v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding disciplinary proceedings within a stipulated time, without quashing the charges at this stage.
UNDER ARMOUR, INC v. ADITYA BIRLA FASHION & RETAIL LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction holding that the defendant's use of marks similar to the plaintiff's registered trademarks on identical sports apparel is prima facie infringing under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
M/S DOON VALLEY FOODS PVT LTD v. M/S BASHESHWAR LAL AMIT KUMAR
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 120-day period for filing written statements in commercial suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 cannot be extended by condoning delay, even due to unforeseen disasters.
Soni Dave v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the Executing Court to dispose of a seven-year-old execution petition within eight weeks, emphasizing the High Court’s supervisory role to ensure expeditious execution proceedings.
Sadab @ Nazeem & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 506, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties involving simple injuries.