Delhi High Court

63,002 judgments

Year:

Mukesh alias Mukesh Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

01 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3488

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 354, 323, 451, and 34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR compromise in criminal cases Section 354 IPC

Alemla Jamir v. NIA

01 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:2995-DB

The Delhi High Court held that filing a complete charge-sheet within the statutory period precludes entitlement to statutory bail, and further investigation or delayed cognizance does not invalidate detention or bail denial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant statutory bail Section 167(2) CrPC charge-sheet Section 173(8) CrPC

Nitin Arora v. Sunita Yadav

01 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3028

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a civil suit on grounds of alleged judicial bias, holding that framing issues in absence of a party and placing initial burden of proof do not constitute bias.

civil petition_dismissed bias framing of issues burden of proof Section 24 CPC

Gulshan Arora & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 May 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:2964

The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Court's order directing convicted appellants under Section 138 NI Act to deposit 20% of fine during appeal and affirmed vacation of suspension of sentence upon non-compliance, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Section 148 NI Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 NI Act Section 148 NI Act deposit of fine suspension of sentence

Sunita Garg v. M/S SCRAFT PRODUCT (P) LTD & Ors.

01 May 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:3109

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act after constitution of the arbitral tribunal, holding that the remedy under Section 17 by the tribunal is efficacious and Court intervention is unwarranted.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act Section 9(3) interim relief Section 17 Arbitration Act interim injunction

Ashish Bansal v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) & Anr.

01 May 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:3046-DB

The Delhi High Court directed waiver of pre-deposit for appeal against a Customs penalty, emphasizing that insisting on pre-deposit would render the remedy illusory, without expressing opinion on the penalty's merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 112(b)(i) Section 129E pre-deposit waiver

Pankaj Aggarwal v. Union of India and Ors.

01 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3016
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to vacate unauthorized premises by a stipulated date, condemning abuse of court process through parallel litigation.

civil petition_dismissed unauthorized occupation adverse possession abuse of process parallel proceedings

Vineet Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

01 May 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:2941-DB

Delhi High Court held that a CRPF personnel’s seniority must be protected when illness attributable to service conditions prevented attendance at a promotional course, directing re-fixation of seniority accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority service-attributable illness malaria-prone area

M/S. Superb Minerals India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr

01 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:2952-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing payment of mesne profits for overstay, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act and the arbitrability of consequential claims arising from the contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral Award

Yudhveer Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

01 May 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:3403

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition after respondents clarified that no restrainment or demolition orders were passed against the petitioner's property, supported by affidavits and site plans.

administrative petition_dismissed restrainment order demolition order property dispute Khasra number

Ankit Handa & Ors. v. State & Anr.

01 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4671

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a bona fide settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Subhendu Jha & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

01 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4664

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Union of India v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd

01 May 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:3366-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court affirmed that DTA suppliers to EOUs are entitled to refund of Terminal Excise Duty under the Foreign Trade Policy, with refunds processed via reversal of CENVAT credit or cash payment, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Sandoz Private Limited.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Terminal Excise Duty CENVAT credit Export Oriented Units Domestic Tariff Area

Mr. Paranjan Chopra, Advocate v. STATE NCT OF DELHI .....

01 May 2023 · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA · 2023:DHC:2959

The Delhi High Court granted one-month parole to a life convict on humanitarian grounds despite previous parole violations, emphasizing parole’s rehabilitative purpose and the need to balance societal and family interests.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole life imprisonment Section 302 IPC Section 367 IPC

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. Cian Healthcare Ltd

01 May 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:3080

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and cancelled the defendant's trademark registration for deceptively similar use of "MGalin" infringing the plaintiff's well-known pharmaceutical trademark "Maxgalin".

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement permanent injunction deceptive similarity well-known trademark

Dhananjay Kumar Mishra and Ors. v. Airports Authority of India & Anr.

01 May 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:3107
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed AAI's review petitions, holding that contractual experience in Executive cadre posts in Government/PSUs qualifies for eligibility and the minimum CTC condition applies only to private sector candidates.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review petition Executive cadre Contractual employment Eligibility criteria

Union of India & Ors. v. MWO (HFO) Shibu VN (Retd.)

29 Apr 2023 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3917-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related unless the employer proves otherwise, and limited its review to errors of law apparent on record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Mukesh Sharma & Anr. v. Suravi Bose

28 Apr 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3044

The Delhi High Court corrected an erroneous date in its earlier judgment to reflect the binding Supreme Court order suspending limitation periods during the COVID-19 pandemic.

civil other limitation period suspension of limitation Supreme Court order corrigendum

Rosemount Inc v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

28 Apr 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:2981

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic patent rejection order for lack of inventive step and remanded the matter for a reasoned speaking order in compliance with natural justice.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent application inventive step speaking order natural justice

Anita Raj v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

28 Apr 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023:DHC:3013

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of show cause notices for unauthorized construction and upheld the order directing the Appellate Tribunal to decide the appeal on merits.

administrative petition_dismissed show cause notice unauthorized construction Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Article 226