Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

Geeta Gupta v. Union of India

12 May 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:3405

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction notices under the PP Act, holding that the petitioner must seek remedy through the statutory forum provided under the Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 7(2) Section 7(3) writ petition maintainability

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/s Bharat Hotels Ltd.

12 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4307-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of Section 14A disallowance where the assessee had not earned exempt income, dismissing the revenue's appeal for AY 2017-18.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act, 1961 disallowance exempt income

Dr Er Rajainderr Jaina v. Rahul Jaina

12 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3414

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order dismissing the petitioner's delayed application to file an amended plaint and allowed the respondent's application to close the right to file the amended plaint due to inordinate delay without sufficient explanation.

civil appeal_dismissed amended plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order VI Rule 18 CPC Section 151 CPC

Quazi Mohammed Ahmed v. Miohammed Sultan

12 May 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:3353
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement for commercial use by his son, finding no suitable alternate accommodation and affirming the Trial Court's order.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternate accommodation

Hitender Shokeen v. Rajan Kumar Shokeen & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:3281

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that allegations of fraud and limitation require trial and evidence and cannot be summarily dismissed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint limitation fraud on court

Dinesh Rana and Another v. The State and Another

12 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3755

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a private dispute under IPC sections 323, 341, 354A, and 34, relying on the parties' amicable settlement and exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement cross FIRs

Jagjit Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3382

The Delhi High Court quashed the conviction under Section 138 N.I. Act following an amicable settlement under Section 147, while imposing costs for delayed surrender.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act compounding of offence quashing of conviction

T S Mokha v. Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd & Anr

12 May 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:3506
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful retirement of a private employee at superannuation, rejecting claims of contractual extension and reinstatement due to lack of proof and failure to mitigate damages.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant private employment superannuation termination of service extension of contract

Ranu and Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr

12 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3756

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

NTPC LTD v. EMAMI POWER LTD; NTPC LTD v. ORIENTAL SALES AGENCIES (INDIA)

12 May 2023 · Najmi Waziri; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:3580-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed NTPC's appeals, holding that Emami and OSAPL were not group companies nor colluded in bidding, and ordered release of their deposits and set aside blacklisting.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant collusion group companies bidding process Earnest Money Deposit

Ashwani Choudhary v. Pratibha Singh

12 May 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:3381-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to convert a contested divorce petition into a mutual consent divorce petition based on a settlement and directed the Family Court to consider waiver of the statutory waiting period.

family appeal_allowed Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13B(1) Section 13B(2)

Ten Events and Entertainment v. Novex Communications Private Limited & Ors.

12 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:3269
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an event manager cannot maintain a suit under Section 60 of the Copyright Act for groundless threats made to hotels demanding licenses for playing songs during wedding ceremonies exempted under Section 52(1)(za), and dismissed the suit as not maintainable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Section 60 Section 52(1)(za) groundless threats

Preeti Kasana v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3407-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition concerning custody of a minor child by accepting a mutually agreed Memorandum of Understanding between estranged parents, emphasizing the child's welfare and binding visitation arrangements.

family other habeas corpus custody of minor child visitation rights welfare of child

Muneer Ahmad v. Registrar of Trade Marks

12 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8404

The Delhi High Court held that a device mark comprising the word 'BHARAT' with a paint brush device is distinctive and not descriptive, setting aside the rejection and remanding for determination of user date.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9(1)(a) Section 9(1)(b) distinctive character

Mother Boon Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Ready Roti India Pvt. Ltd.

12 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4994
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a party seeking appointment of a substitute arbitrator after withdrawal must first communicate with the other party to agree on the appointment before approaching the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 15(1)(a) Section 29A(4)

Union of India & Ors. v. Wo Binod Kumar Sah

12 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2390-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for hypertension, holding that the military must provide cogent reasons to rebut the presumption of service connection for diseases manifesting after long service.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension military service primary hypertension Release Medical Board

Madan Lal v. Union of India and Anr.

11 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3265-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a retired employee entitled to gratuity arrears after notional promotion is entitled to interest on delayed payment, directing payment of interest at 9% per annum for the delay period.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant notional promotion terminal benefits gratuity interest on delayed payment

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Neetu Devi & Ors.

11 May 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:3360

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by upholding income assessment based on minimum wages, directing addition of future prospects at 40%, disallowing separate loss of affection damages, and reducing interest rate to 7.5%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation future prospects minimum wages

OPENTV INC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR

11 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3305

The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal of a patent application for a media gifting system on the ground that it constituted a non-patentable business method under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, and held that claim amendments broadening scope are impermissible at the appellate stage.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patentability business method Section 3(k) Patents Act amendment of claims

Hugo Boss Trademark Management GmbH and Co KG v. Hertz Chemicals Pvt Ltd and Anr

11 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:3287

The Delhi High Court disposed of the trademark infringement suit by binding the defendant to an affidavit discontinuing the impugned products, with the plaintiff's consent, thereby rendering the grievance non-justiciable.

civil appeal_allowed discontinuation of manufacture affidavit trade mark dispute suit disposal