Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
SHRI CHARANJEET SINGH & ANR. v. SHRI HARVINDER SINGH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court rejected the suit seeking declaration of joint ownership and cancellation of sale deed on grounds of no cause of action, limitation bar, and applicability of the Benami Transactions Act, holding the property as absolute ownership of defendant No.2.
Yogesh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit for Indian Coast Guard recruitment, holding that the final medical examination by expert boards is conclusive and not subject to judicial interference.
Kishor Bandekar and Ors. v. Mahesh Candolkar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the Goa Chess Association's rules do not restrict the Executive Committee to one representative per taluka, dismissing the appeal challenging multiple representatives from the same taluka.
Divisional Engineer Telecom v. Munshi Prasad & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld divisional seniority-based retrenchment of casual labourers in the Railway Electrification Project, setting aside the Labour Court's award of reinstatement and back wages.
SMC Global Securities Limited v. Pankaj Singh @ Love Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award compensating an investor for actual loss from unauthorized stock transactions, rejecting claims that the loss was notional or barred by NSE Bye Laws.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court directed supervised demarcation and redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir land, regulated street vendors outside the premises, and allowed intervention of affected parties including the Lotus Temple and a third-party contractor.
Dhara Singh v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of a bank clerk for misappropriation of customer funds, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental enquiries where procedural fairness and evidence exist.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Gopal Kumar Goyal
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the Assessing Officer fails to clearly specify in the penalty notice whether concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars is the basis for penalty.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council
The Delhi High Court held that the MSMED Act does not apply to statutory fee disputes under the Income Tax Act and that the MSEFC lacks jurisdiction to entertain such claims, staying arbitration proceedings initiated by the MSEFC.
M/S Fortune Group v. Chief Engineer PWD (NH) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay on the debarment of M/s Fortune Group from government contracts, holding that debarment requires prior determination of fraudulent conduct which was absent here as the petitioner was exonerated by CBI.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. B N Magon
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in its order to include the name of the respondent's counsel omitted earlier.
Rachna Mediratta and Ors. v. Girdhari Lal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's orders allowing amendments to the plaint and extending time for filing amended pleadings in a partition suit, emphasizing liberal exercise of amendment powers and rejecting abatement on death of a plaintiff.
Ram Pratap & Anr. v. Union of India (Ministry of Railway)
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for compensation, holding that valid journey tickets establish bonafide passenger status and accidental death on train qualifies as an untoward incident under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act.
Ram Avtar Tyagi v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an undertrial accused in a narcotics case after over five years of custody, applying the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee principles with conditions.
Sukbir Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D/323 IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Subhash Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside disciplinary punishment imposed without proof of charges and granted consequential benefits to the employee.
Uniseven Engineering and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council District (South) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under the MSMED Act, 2006, only suppliers registered as micro or small enterprises can file claims before the MSEFC, and buyers cannot independently invoke its jurisdiction against suppliers.
Dr. M.P. Chaudhary v. Netaji Subhas University of Technology and Anr.
Delhi High Court quashed the termination of a Visiting Faculty for failure to follow statutory procedure and natural justice, directing issuance of show cause notice and fair hearing before any removal.
H.S. Bajaj & Anr. v. Satish Chopra
The Delhi High Court allowed eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, holding that bona fide need of the landlord is presumed and non-disclosure of other premises or absence of bona fide need in rent notice does not negate eviction claim.
Aruna Singh v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging reassessment under the Income Tax Act, permitting the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies and directing the Assessing Officer to consider stay applications per established guidelines.