Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Rahul Slathia v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed the medical board's rejection of the petitioner on hypertension grounds for non-compliance with mandatory hospitalization and testing guidelines, directing a fresh examination.
Naresh Kumar Sood and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a pay fixation order, directing the petitioners to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal through fresh proceedings.
Nekpal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a 62-year-old advocate accused of forgery and facilitating an unlawful marriage, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with the investigation.
Sterlite Power Transmission Limited v. M/S EPC Solutions LLP
The Delhi High Court held that the MSMED Act applies to suppliers who were micro or small enterprises on the contract date, and MSEFC jurisdiction extends accordingly, upholding arbitration referral despite respondent's later reclassification as a medium enterprise.
M/S Metal Edge v. Sales Tax Officer Class II & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a Goods and Services Tax Officer designated by notification is a proper officer under the CGST Act empowered to issue show cause notices and cancel GST registration, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge on jurisdictional grounds.
Shri Akram Ali & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' genuine settlement and dissolution of marriage.
Wasim and Others v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Upasana Gupta v. Directorate of Education Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization and pay fixation of a teacher, holding that termination orders are challengeable only before the Delhi School Tribunal under Section 8(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.
Santosh Kumar Aggarwal v. M/S Aluco Panel Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies prospectively and that failure to file a written statement within 120 days bars raising jurisdictional and merit-based defenses.
The Hershey Company v. Dilip Kumar Bacha
The Delhi High Court considered the jurisdictional question of maintainability of a trademark cancellation petition under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and appointed amici curiae to assist on the issue, deferring final decision.
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavitha Kuruganti
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of PepsiCo India's registration of the FL 2027 potato variety due to incorrect information and failure to provide valid assignment proof under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001.
Jindal Industries Pvt Ltd v. Prawesh Agencies
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark and copyright infringement suit by decree on a lawful settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, with the defendant admitting plaintiff's rights and withdrawing contested trademark applications.
Mohd. Amaan Malik v. The State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging sexual assault of a minor, holding that consent of a minor is legally irrelevant and the POCSO Act overrides personal laws, thus allowing investigation and trial to proceed.
Shachi Gahoi v. Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a contractual woman employee during pregnancy-related absence violated the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, quashing the termination and directing reinstatement with back wages.
Kush Mangla & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sandeep Kadian v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a Review Medical Board's rejection on hypertension grounds for non-compliance with mandatory medical examination guidelines and directed a fresh examination.
Nawal Kishore Jha v. The State and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the appointment of Additional Public Prosecutors requires consultation with the High Court whose views are binding, and judicial review of such appointments is limited to procedural fairness, dismissing the petition challenging non-approval of candidature without communication of reasons.
Sh Man Mohan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
M/S GRAND MUMTAZ HOTEL AND RESORT v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NORTH EAST GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that MSMED Act dispute resolution provisions apply only if the supplier was registered on the contract date, setting aside arbitration initiated after subsequent registration.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Nagar Dairy Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 14-day delay in filing an income tax appeal but dismissed the appeal as the issue was already settled by binding precedent.