Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Suresh Sachdev v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed and proved Will dated 25.09.1987, allowing the petitioner letters of administration under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
GAUTAM MALHOTRA & ANR. ..... Petitioners v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of petitioners' bank accounts as fraud for failure to provide an opportunity of hearing, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling that natural justice must be observed before such classification.
Mohd Sair v. State
Interim bail was granted on medical grounds in a serious criminal case with stringent conditions to address threat perception and ensure trial integrity.
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award limiting forfeiture of Bank Guarantee to reasonable compensation due to lack of proof of actual loss, emphasizing restricted judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Ajit Singh & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed probate of a Will duly executed and deposited with the Registrar, rejecting suspicious testimony and upholding the validity of the Khetri Trust's testamentary bequest.
Roseline Wilson & Ors v. Archaeological Survey of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging ASI eviction orders, holding that ownership cannot be established solely by Jamabandi entries and that eviction from protected government land was lawful after due process.
Rahul Deep v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the medical board's rejection of a candidate on hypertension grounds for non-compliance with prescribed medical examination guidelines and directed a fresh examination.
IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED v. HITACHI MGRM NET LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an arbitral tribunal's jurisdictional order, holding that jurisdictional objections dismissed under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act are not appealable and that disputes under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act require factual determination by the tribunal, thus discouraging premature judicial interference.
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award denying forfeiture of a Bank Guarantee as general damages due to lack of proof of actual loss, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kamlesh Kothari v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in an organized crime syndicate, holding that MCOCA applies based on syndicate-wide continuing unlawful activity and confessional statements under Section 18 are admissible at trial.
S M Trading Co v. Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for adjudication of Customs Show Cause Notices issued by proper Customs officers is mandatory and cannot be extended by Board's directions applicable only to SCNs originally issued by DRI officers, quashing SCNs issued beyond limitation.
Aadya Antya v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for re-evaluation of examination answer scripts, holding that an express prohibition in the Rules bars re-evaluation even under Article 226, absent material error.
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award setting aside contract cancellation and Bank Guarantee forfeiture, emphasizing limited judicial interference and the necessity of proving actual loss for general damages in supply contracts.
CHAPTER 4 CORP. v. DHANPREET SINGH TRADING AS M/S PUNJABI ADDA
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark suit, declared the 'SUPREME' red box device mark as well-known, and restrained the Defendant from using or registering similar marks.
Anuj Mishra & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties.
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd v. IDBI Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding damages to IDBI for breach of a Substitution Agreement by HSIIDC, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.
M/S Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Leo Roadlines Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to cross-examine witnesses is a statutory right that cannot be denied by prematurely closing evidence, set aside the trial court's order striking off defense, and restored the suit for further proceedings.
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award limiting forfeiture of Bank Guarantee to reasonable compensation due to lack of proof of actual loss, emphasizing restricted judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Star India Pvt Ltd v. Moviesjoy.in & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against rogue websites for unauthorized streaming of the film 'Chhapaak', confirming blocking and suspension orders to protect the Plaintiff's copyright.
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co-operative Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the arbitral award that limited damages to 3% of the contract value due to lack of proof of actual loss, affirming the restricted scope of judicial interference in arbitral awards.