Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Taher Hussain v. State
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced an order on a bail application filed by Tahir Hussain, referring to a prior bail order, with the decision uploaded on the court's website.
Hansraj v. Commissioner of Police and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that training period prior to formal promotion as Head Constable (AWO) under Delhi Police Rules, 1980, does not count for increments or pay scale entitlement.
M/S Chitra Hardware v. Commissioner of VAT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against default assessment under the DVAT Act due to failure to produce documentary evidence to substantiate input tax credit claims, affirming the onus on the assessee to prove genuineness of ITC.
Pr. Commissioner, Central Excise and CGST-Delhi South v. Blackberry India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT’s order allowing BlackBerry India’s refund claim, ruling that it was not an intermediary and its services qualified as export of taxable services under the relevant service tax laws.
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd v. Jugnu Kumari
The insurer is liable to pay compensation for motor accident claims even if the vehicle lacked a valid permit but retains the right to recover the amount from the owner and driver.
Ashok Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. Anil Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that inquiry under Section 202 CrPC can be satisfied by affidavits without examining witnesses on oath when the accused resides outside the court's jurisdiction.
Roopak’s Pik and Pay v. The Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed acceptance and advertisement of the appellant's trademark application, holding that similarity with family-owned marks is not a valid ground for rejection.
Deepak Dahiya & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical board findings that declared BSF officers unfit due to being overweight, holding no provision exists to grant additional opportunity for weight reduction and re-examination.
Rajesh Jindal v. Sanjay Khurana
The Delhi High Court allowed recall of the complainant for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, imposing conditions to prevent delay and prejudice.
Ish Bhatnagar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging forgery and cheating, holding that inconclusive forensic evidence alone does not justify quashing and the investigation must be allowed to proceed.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Mahipal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that absence of a valid Fitness Certificate on the accident date entitles the insurer to recover compensation from the vehicle owner, allowing the insurer's appeal.
Shri Rohit Chhabra v. Nishala Chhabra
The Delhi High Court disposed of the maintenance appeal by recording a mutual settlement between the parties covering alimony, divorce, and related criminal proceedings, thereby setting aside the maintenance order.
Syngenta Participations AG v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal filed by Syngenta Participations AG against the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs as withdrawn on the appellant's request.
Ashok Kumar v. Pappu Yadav & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding future prospects, increasing pain and suffering damages, and raising special diet and conveyance allowances, affirming insurer's recovery rights.
M/S Mantena v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition restraining invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee, holding that such guarantees are payable on demand absent established fraud or special equities.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sapna Trivedi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the insurance company's liability to pay compensation despite the offending vehicle lacking a valid permit, applying Delhi minimum wages based on the deceased's residence, and dismissed the insurer's appeal.
Sukhmeet Kaur v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28 1 and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to issue a show cause notice and provide the petitioner an opportunity to respond before passing an assessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Essential Interiors Designs Pvt Ltd v. Globe International Inc
Delhi High Court held that agreement on venue of arbitration alone does not confer exclusive jurisdiction on courts at that venue; jurisdiction depends on seat of arbitration, cause of action, and parties' business location.
Himalaya Wellness Company & Ors. v. Wipro Enterprises Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of the prior user plaintiffs holding that the defendant's use of identical trademark 'EVECARE' for allied goods amounts to passing off despite defendant's registration in a different class.
Union of India v. Narinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing the petitioners to pass a fresh order reinstating the respondent without treating his absence period as "dies non" for all service benefits, emphasizing proper compliance with tribunal directions.