Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Rashmi Yadav v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed that the appointment of the last selectee to the PGT (Chemistry) post be subject to the outcome of the pending original application before the Tribunal, thereby protecting the petitioner's rights without granting interim relief.
Jyoti Narang v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order due to defective service of show-cause notice and granted the petitioner a fresh opportunity to respond, reinforcing the principles of natural justice in tax proceedings.
Praveen Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of serious offences under IPC, POCSO, and IT Act due to non-cooperation with investigation and proclaimed offender status.
Sandeep @ Pinto & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Govt. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC following amicable settlement and reunion of the married parties, exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Mohd. Moshin alias Mosin & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, while preserving the children's legal rights.
Sh. Hemant Kumar & Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354B IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satender
The Delhi High Court held that compensation for loss of future prospects is payable to a permanently disabled motor accident victim, recalculated the award accordingly, set aside compensation for loss of marriage prospects after claimant's marriage, and rejected enhancement claims lacking evidence.
Sunil Kumar v. Larsen and Toubro Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC requires a clear, unambiguous admission of liability, and dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking decree on alleged admission in the defendant's reply to a legal notice.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Brig Yogesh Kapoor
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, affirming the presumption that diseases arising post-entry are attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex HA -III Shakti Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman with seizure disorder, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ review to errors of law.
Shiv Kali @ Bharti v. Shyam Narayan Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by adopting 63% functional disability, minimum wage income, and 40% future prospects, directing the insurer to pay the increased amount with interest.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Competition Commission of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Competition Commission of India lacks jurisdiction to inquire into patentees' exercise of patent rights under the Patents Act, confining anti-competitive patent licensing disputes to the Patents Act regime.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Director of Legal Metrology & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appellants importing fuel dispensing equipment for self-use were not required to register under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, and directed refund of compounding fees paid without legal liability.
Corporal Kumavat Sagar Nana v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court transferred a writ petition challenging Air Force leave and discharge policies to the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming its jurisdiction over such matters.
M/S. BAKSHI MARK (P) LTD v. ASSESSMENT UNIT & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order passed without considering the petitioner's timely medical accommodation request, directing fresh proceedings with liberty to respond.
Jai Raj & Anr. v. Jai Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted sale of partnership property to satisfy outstanding dues under a family settlement, directing payment of principal and interest and cooperation in executing sale documents.
Guerrilla Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Merapashu360 Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes under a Membership Agreement, directing arbitration under DIAC with required disclosures.
JAGRITI YADAV v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 36(1) DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the petitioner’s response and directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh speaking order after hearing the petitioner.
Chelakara Ramaswamy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of External Affairs to publicly post and disseminate SOPs and guidelines for transportation of mortal remains of Indian nationals abroad to ensure transparency and assist distressed families.
Mohinder Singh v. D.T.C. & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that an employee who voluntarily retired under a scheme excluding pension benefits cannot claim such benefits or reinstatement after acceptance of retirement.