Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
New Balance Athletics Inc. v. “Nine”Plus Shoes Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for trademark infringement of New Balance's registered 'N' marks on footwear, allowing limited use of the word 'NINE' and reserving the well-known trademark status issue for separate hearing.
Kal Airways Pvt. Limited v. SpiceJet Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a shareholding dispute, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the petitioners' challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
Kal Airways Pvt. Limited v. SpiceJet Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the petitioners' challenge based on patent illegality and public policy grounds.
Jagmohan Vishwakarma and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inter se seniority of ITBP officers must be fixed as per applicable Recruitment Rules reckoning seniority of direct recruits from date of appointment, not date of result declaration, dismissing petitioners' claim for seniority revision.
Sunkari Sagar v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical unfitness for recruitment due to Hansen's disease, upholding the disqualification under armed forces medical guidelines.
Aparna Badde v. Raj Kumar Badde
The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing the petitioner to vacate the original government accommodation and shift to the new accommodation allotted to the respondent, affirming that the petitioner’s right to reside under the DV Act extends to the new accommodation and that remedies for cohabitation issues lie under the Act.
Kusum v. The State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner involved in heroin trafficking due to commercial quantity seized, prior criminal record, and necessity of custodial interrogation to unravel conspiracy.
Winzo Games Pvt. Ltd. v. Google LLC
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs to withdraw their suit with liberty to re-approach the court and ordered refund of court fees, disposing of the suit accordingly.
Union of India v. Besco Limited (Wagon Division)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in favor of Besco Limited, dismissing Union of India's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act for lack of grounds to interfere with the arbitrator's findings and contract interpretation.
SpiceJet Limited v. Kal Airways Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award refunding CRPS amounts with interest, holding that limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not permit setting aside the award absent patent illegality or conflict with public policy.
SpiceJet Limited v. Kal Airways Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, holding that limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not permit reappraisal of contract interpretation or factual findings absent patent illegality or public policy violation.
Government of India Press Workers Association v. Central Administrative Tribunal
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's policy decision to merge 17 Government of India Presses into five, ruling that employees governed by Central Civil Services rules have all India transfer liability and that statutory provisions on closure and notice under the Industrial Disputes Act do not apply to such redeployments.
Arafat & Ors. v. Dheeraj Kumar Tripathi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award holding the registered owner liable for compensation despite alleged post-accident transfer, affirmed contributory negligence and disability assessments, and dismissed the appellants’ challenge to service and quantum of compensation.
M/S VIKAS ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (GST), DELHI NORTH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that only the Commissioner can lawfully freeze a taxpayer's bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act, and set aside an unauthorized communication freezing the petitioner's account.
Kamaldeep Singh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from family disputes under various IPC sections based on a comprehensive settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Laxmi v. Kanhaiya Lal Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry harassment and criminal breach of trust case due to insufficient and uncorroborated evidence under Sections 498A and 406 IPC.
Rakesh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of child victim and other witnesses for cross-examination in a sexual offence case, holding that the accused's right to fair trial must be balanced against the victim's protection from repeated trauma under the POCSO Act.
Kamla Kapoor & Ors. v. Tejinder Kaur Kohli & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's closure of the petitioners' right to lead expert evidence on disputed documents, holding that repeated failure to avail granted opportunities justified such closure and that belated review applications amounted to abuse of process.
Santokh Singh Chawla v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside cognizance of offences under Sections 186 and 188 IPC for non-compliance with mandatory written complaint requirement under Section 195 Cr.P.C., while upholding FIR registration and police investigation.
NTPC Ltd. v. Tata Projects Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional compensation to the contractor for increased scope and costs under an EPC contract, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.