Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Sh. Karan Dhingra & Anr. v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Hanny Kumar v. Anu Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a possession decree, holding that unregistered writings do not confer ownership, possession claims must be based on valid title, and prior unconditional withdrawal of appeal bars subsequent challenge via review.
Malti Rawat v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that appointments to the post of Lab Attendant (Finger Print) in NCRB shall be subject to the outcome of the pending Original Application, dismissing the petitioner's interim relief seeking to keep a vacancy vacant.
Binku Sachdeva Kaur @ Gurneet Singh and Ors. v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Tripta Puri v. Prashant Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the recall of defense witnesses and held that sufficient opportunity was given to petitioners, emphasizing that delay and failure to avail hearing rights justify dismissal.
Vikas Motors P. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator’s petition to dissolve Vikas Motors Pvt. Ltd. after completion of liquidation, permitting transfer of unclaimed dividends to RBI and discharge of the Official Liquidator.
M/S. PARASHNATH PAPER UDYOG v. M/S. DEVIKA PACKAGING
The Delhi High Court held that initiation of pre-institution mediation and declaration of mediation as a non-starter satisfies Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2018, and a suit filed thereafter is maintainable.
Mukesh Kumar Thakur v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the Insurance Company to deposit the enhanced compensation awarded to the injured claimant along with interest and costs, rejecting the Insurance Company's claim of ambiguity in the order.
USV Private Limited v. Mascot Health Series Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of USV Private Limited, restraining Mascot Health Series Pvt. Ltd. from using the deceptively similar trademark "ROSUDAY" for rosuvastatin tablets, holding it infringed the registered mark "ROSEDAY".
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Mamta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld rash and negligent driving liability but modified compensation awards in a motor accident claim appeal, aligning future loss and non-pecuniary damages with Supreme Court precedents.
Sandeep Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a teacher accused of sexually abusing a 12-year-old student, emphasizing the gravity of offences under POCSO and IPC and the breach of trust inherent in the teacher-student relationship.
Sandeep Kumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a teacher accused of sexually abusing a 12-year-old student, emphasizing the gravity of offences against minors and the breach of trust inherent in the teacher-student relationship.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Sandeep Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded to the claimant for loss of dependency of a deceased homemaker by adopting minimum wages for an unskilled worker as the appropriate notional income, emphasizing just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
M/S Jayem Auto Industries (P) Ltd. v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside unreasoned recovery tribunal orders against a company, directing fresh adjudication on whether payments made discharged its liability on hundies discounted by the bank.
Rajdhani Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. v. Punjab and Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court held that civil suits do not stay recovery proceedings under the RDB Act and directed the DRT to proceed expeditiously with the bank's recovery claims against the petitioner.
Chitrasen v. Mohd Hrun & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing disability assessment, including employer contributions in income, adding future prospects, awarding attendant and disfigurement charges, and substantially increasing prosthetic limb compensation.
Shilpi Verma v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's dismissal of a challenge to CBSE's selection process, holding that the interview was part of the advertised criteria and there was no arbitrariness in awarding marks.
Harinder Dhingra v. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DRAT order allowing impleadment of a third party alleged to have fraudulently siphoned bank funds in recovery proceedings, affirming the bank's right as dominus litis to amend claims and implead necessary parties.
Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre v. M/S Sparkle Assocaistes
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that courts cannot interfere with an award on merits unless it is perverse or patently illegal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sanjay Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the cooperative society to respond to the petitioner's ownership and charge-related complaints within seven days, with further action by the Registrar Cooperative Societies if no reply is received.