Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
L&T Valves Limited v. Unitek Valves Private Limited
The Delhi High Court decreed commercial suits in favor of L&T Valves Limited based on a lawful and binding settlement agreement resolving trademark infringement disputes.
School Management of Ring Midways Senior Secondary Public School v. Azad Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld an interlocutory order permitting defreezing of a school's bank accounts to pay employees, emphasizing appellate restraint in interfering with discretionary orders protecting employee rights.
Union of India v. Ex-MCME-II Ravish Babu
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service absent contrary proof.
Sapna & Ors. v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding future prospects while upholding the deduction of one-third income towards personal expenses and the use of Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for income determination.
Sanjay v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shri Jatin Gupta @ Parul v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence Unit Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a person summoned under Section 69 of the CGST Act cannot claim anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC and refused to grant writ protection against arrest when no arrest proceedings had been initiated.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4 v. M/s National Fertilizers Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's application for condonation of a 498-day delay in filing an income tax appeal, holding that no sufficient cause was shown and emphasizing that government departments must adhere strictly to limitation periods.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Birjpal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by increasing the deduction for personal expenses due to the claimant husband being an earning member and reduced the interest rate on the compensation.
Vasu Bajaj v. Rakesh Bajaj
The Delhi High Court held that arrears of maintenance beyond the one-year limitation under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C constitute a recoverable debt enforceable through a civil suit, allowing recovery of such arrears despite procedural limitations on execution.
Shambhu Sharma v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking 'equal pay for equal work' benefits based on a 1990 letter, holding the claim barred by constructive res judicata as it was not raised in earlier petitions.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Birjpal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for loss of medical leaves and disability in a motor accident claim but reduced the interest rate from 9% to 7.5% per annum.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Mayank Service Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of investors under Section 68, thereby justifying the addition of Rs. 45 crores as unexplained cash credit.
Karanti Goyal v. Ministry of Environment Forests Climate Change & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition upholding the applicability of the walking test requirement under the Indian Forest Service Recruitment Rules, 2014 to persons with disabilities, rejecting claims for exemption under disability law.
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Dept. of Ports, Govt. of India v. Ernst and Young Pvt. Ltd (now known as Ernst and Young LLP) and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts from receipt of the signed corrected award or disposal of Section 33 request, and that scanned signed copies sent by email constitute valid delivery, thereby allowing the petition as filed within time.
Ravi Kumar alias Ravi Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 323, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce.
Shalini Mittal v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and orders issued without proper application of mind despite the petitioner having disclosed relevant transactions and submitted supporting documents under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Quickroutes International Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int 3 1 1 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to provide the petitioner an opportunity to produce documents and directed a fresh inquiry with proper hearing.
M/S Deep and Veer Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – 3
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order rejecting a delayed appeal for AY 2006-07 due to lack of reasonable cause and insufficient evidence of hiring expenses.
Surender Mohan Pathak v. Abhinav Shrivastava & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntary settlement agreement reached through mediation, allowing refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Shivani Chanana v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to transfer three criminal cases from Rohini Courts to Karkardooma Courts, holding that inconvenience alone does not justify transfer when cases are at an advanced stage and proper jurisdiction exists.