Delhi High Court
63,783 judgments
A.S. v. D.S.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay fixed interim maintenance and educational expenses to his wife and younger child.
Rahul Dilip Shah v. The Catalyst Trusteeship Limited & Ors.
The court held that the debenture trustee is entitled to exercise voting rights over pledged shares upon continuing events of default, dismissing the plaintiff's application to restore voting rights despite loan restructuring.
Pinki Irani v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted bail to Pinki Irani in an MCOCA case, holding that prima facie evidence did not conclusively establish her membership in the organized crime syndicate and that stringent bail conditions under Section 21(4) were not met.
Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd. v. M/s Sheena Exports & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Recovery Officer of DRT-II to expedite recovery proceedings and dispose of attached properties within six months in a petition filed under Article 227.
Zaibi Hussain v. Jamal Tariq
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to promptly decide its jurisdiction and dispose of the petitioner’s interim custody application under the Guardians and Wards Act without undue adjournments.
GAIL INDIA LTD v. M/S ADVANCE INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an interim restraining order and dismissed the Section 9 arbitration petition as withdrawn without deciding on the merits, reserving all rights.
Baljor v. Suraj Bhan
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 17,000 per month for a commercial shop pending final adjudication, directing interim payments and referring the parties to mediation.
Kordient Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to seek revocation of GST registration cancellation and directed reconsideration of the application to amend the principal place of business due to lack of reasoned orders and procedural fairness.
Parshant Jain v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied where the petitioner’s modus operandi indicated dishonest intention to misappropriate goods and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the money trail.
Krishna Dutta Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to expeditiously decide the petitioners' statutory petition under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968, and declined to interfere judicially at this stage.
P. V. Vijayaraghavan & Ors. v. Nityam Software Solution Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that serious irregularities including votes cast by deceased persons and breach of secret ballot principle vitiate the IOA 2020 elections, allowing the plaintiffs' application to restrain defendants from functioning.
Satbir Singh v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider the petitioner's monetary claim on merits without being barred by limitation, given the admitted shortage of funds.
Sunil Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304A IPC on the basis of accidental death and settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Md. Shahid @ Munna Builder v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a builder accused of trespass and forgery in a property dispute, holding that prima facie forged documents and mala fide conduct justify denial of bail despite completion of investigation.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Mahender Singh
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, a valid domestic enquiry finding unauthorized absence as misconduct warrants approval of dismissal, and the Tribunal erred in refusing approval based solely on leave without pay entries.
Sanjay Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful arrest and remand of a politician under PMLA, affirming compliance with statutory safeguards and rejecting claims of illegal arrest and malice.
Hargopal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation under the MACP Scheme and decide it within eight weeks, dismissing the writ petition without adjudicating on merits.
Wills John v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA cannot cancel a flat allotment without notice after acceptance of confirmation deposit and payments, directing possession to be handed over to the petitioner.
Baby Samayra & Ors. v. Darbari Lal DAV Model School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of EWS students provisionally admitted under the RTE Act while denying admission rights to those without provisional orders beyond the academic year, clarifying the scope of seat reservation and carry forward principles.
Omkara Footwear v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition and remanded the GST refund rejection orders for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to respond to all grounds including supplier existence and payment timelines.