Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Shivanand Jain & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to pronounce judgment within four weeks, emphasizing the statutory mandate for expeditious disposal under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Deepali Chhabra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition partly by setting aside the fine imposed on a police officer for an inadvertent error in warrant execution reports, emphasizing proper procedure and judicial restraint.
Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. A B Sugars Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants’ use of the mark “INDIAN STAG” and Stag device infringes the plaintiff’s registered “ROYAL STAG” trademarks and amounts to passing off, granting injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Manohar Lal Bhatia v. Harpal Singh Lamba
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs.22,000 per month for a residential premises during the pendency of a revision petition, conditioning interim protection on timely payment.
M/S Tirath Ram Naresh Kumar and Ors. v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court set aside the DRAT order rejecting the appeal for non-deposit of 50% of the debt and remanded the matter to consider the petitioners' plea for relaxation to 25% pre-deposit under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
Rajeev Chetal v. Honey Kansal
The Delhi High Court struck off improperly filed documents, directed fresh evidence and issue framing by the Trial Court, and emphasized procedural safeguards including managing adjournments and defence conduct.
Sudhanshu Kumar v. Union of India
Petition challenging amendments to recruitment rules was dismissed as withdrawn after the Court indicated an inclination to dismiss it on merits and maintainability grounds.
Union of India v. Rani Constructions Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal challenging an arbitral award for lack of sufficient cause to condone delay and upheld the arbitral award on merits, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods and limited judicial interference in arbitration.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against deletion of protective additions under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, holding no substantial question of law arises after the substantive addition was dropped on merits by a coordinate bench.
Bhawana Sharma v. Shyam Sunder Sharma
The Delhi High Court set aside a Family Court decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that the husband failed to prove cruelty and that the power to grant divorce on irretrievable breakdown lies solely with the Supreme Court.
Sakh Alam @ Shekh Alam v. The State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act despite settlement and marriage between parties, holding that serious non-compoundable offences cannot be quashed on compromise.
Sandeep Patil v. Arifa Farooq @ Arifa Haroon and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to condone delay in filing the written statement in a civil suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits subject to costs and strict conditions.
Priyanka Saraswat Dev Alias Raksha v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue to provide seized documents and electronic data free of cost to the petitioner, applying the principle of access to justice under Article 21 in tax assessment proceedings.
Naresh Pahadiya v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to allot an alternative vending site to a disabled street vendor pending final decision by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Raj Dev Ram v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order that upheld the selection committee's criteria limiting interview calls, holding that a failed candidate cannot claim re-evaluation or interview merely by securing minimum qualifying marks.
Piyush Awasthi v. M/S God Plus Glass Industry Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to lead evidence despite prior non-appearance, emphasizing justice over procedural default with strict conditions.
Harpreet Singh Toni v. Sukhbir Inder Singh Basra & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's order closing the appellant's right to file a written statement due to valid service of summons and non-compliance within the prescribed period.
INTEC EXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of IGST paid during the GST transitional period, holding that denial based on higher duty drawback claims is ultra vires and unconstitutional, subject to adjustment of differential drawback amounts.
Vinod Kumar v. Manmohan Singh Gandhi Thr Lrs & Anr
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative user and occupation charges at Rs.15,000 per month for a commercial tenant during the pendency of a revision petition, balancing location, size, and age of the premises.
Garima Minda v. Rajni Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's rejection of belated objections to a Local Commissioner's report in a landlord-tenant possession suit, holding such objections as abuse of process and imposing costs.