Delhi High Court
63,783 judgments
Nirmal Tower Building Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of CEPCO as a necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC in reference proceedings under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, dismissing the appeal filed by Nirmal Towers.
W Sunita Chanu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to treat a belated legal notice as a representation and dispose of it in accordance with law, allowing consideration of limitation.
Pradeep v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of medical unfitness of the petitioner for recruitment due to Varicose Vein, confirming the validity of a fresh medical examination and the binding nature of Medical Board findings.
Dr. Nivedita Pandey v. Santosh Pandey
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a civil suit on the basis of an amicable settlement and ordered a partial refund of court fees.
Bikramjit Ahluwalia v. Student Inn Services & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's suit for arrears of rent and mesne profits at Rs.16 lakh per month with interest reduced to 6% per annum, following lawful termination of tenancy and ex-parte proceedings against the tenant.
Rahul Mishra v. Neha Rai
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner's interim application for unsupervised and overnight visitation rights with his minor son pending the guardianship petition, emphasizing timely disposal and interim arrangements.
YWC Gym Management Pvt Ltd v. Anil Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court stayed the attachment order in execution proceedings subject to deposit of undisputed amounts and undertakings regarding security deposit adjustment pending adjudication.
Baljit Singh v. Delhi Medical Council & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a medical negligence complaint against a cardiologist, holding that the treatment was in accordance with accepted medical practice and that the court will not interfere with expert medical opinion absent perversity.
Madhu Sudan Sharma & Ors. v. Omaxe Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that raising an arbitration objection in the written statement suffices under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the suit must be referred to arbitration if such objection is raised timely.
BT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that refund claims based on self-assessed returns cannot be rejected without proper reassessment or show cause notice, emphasizing procedural fairness and clarifying the scope of 'export of services' under service tax law.
HDA Flavours Pvt Ltd v. Daddy’s Hospitality Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to remove the restraint on the appellant from creating new franchises under the disputed brand during arbitration, emphasizing balanced interim relief consistent with admitted facts.
Azad Market Residents Welfare Association v. Ministry of Home Affairs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL on illegal constructions in Azad Market, directing strict enforcement of fire safety norms and advising future complaints be addressed to the Special Task Force.
GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. v. AZAM KHAN
The Delhi High Court held that medals won in National Shooting Championships under National Rules do not qualify for out of turn promotion under Standing Order No. 4/1989, setting aside the Tribunal's order granting such promotion.
ATC Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the Court has jurisdiction to extend the time for arbitral award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act even after expiry of the arbitrator's mandate, allowing the petitions for extension filed post-expiry.
Viridian Development Managers Private Limited & Anr. v. RPS Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining a developer from using the "World Trade Centre Faridabad" trademarks after termination of the license agreement, affirming that ex-licensees cannot use marks post-termination and must transition within a reasonable period.
All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. UOI and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the CBDT's Central Action Plan adequately addresses delays in income tax appeal disposal, dismissing the PIL while urging the Union of India to increase Commissioners (Appeals) strength.
Seema Khattar v. The Project and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the dismissal of a public servant for misconduct involving concealment of material facts and dishonesty, affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary proceedings.
Shantanu v. The State
The Delhi High Court modified the conviction from penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 POCSO to aggravated sexual assault under Section 10 POCSO due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of evidence of penetration.
Management of Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Sr. Sec. School v. Sumit Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the reinstatement of teachers whose purported resignation and its acceptance by the school were found invalid due to procedural non-compliance under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules.
Lovelesh Singhal v. Commissioner, Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that tax payments made under duress during search proceedings are involuntary and must be refunded, while upholding the validity of the search authorization under the CGST Act.