Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Harpreet Singh Talwar @ Kabir Talwar v. The State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea in a major transnational narcotics smuggling case, holding that prima facie evidence and risks of witness tampering justify continued custody under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.
M/s. Autopet; Shweta Jayprakash Singh v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Bombay High Court quashed the arbitrary termination of a petroleum dealership by BPCL where seals were intact and no proof of tampering was found, restoring the petitioners' dealership and supply.
Chhagan Ramchandra Pondkule v. Dhanaji Dinkar Jadhav
The Bombay High Court held that the Competent Authority rightly declined to refer a dispute over compensation apportionment to the Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, as no prima facie dispute over entitlement existed.
Dr. Deelip Mhaisekar v. Dr. Ajay Sahebrao Chandanwale & State of Maharashtra
The High Court allowed the writ petition, holding that additional charge does not confer legal right, estopping the senior officer from challenging long-accepted administrative orders, and restored the petitioner to hold additional charge till superannuation.
Adarsh Bharat Enviro Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a bidder debarred on the tender submission date and failing mandatory pre-qualification criteria is ineligible, quashing the tender committee's decision allowing such bidder to participate.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. A.T. Kearney Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing additions on intra group services and receivables, affirming that tax authorities cannot disallow business expenditures or restructure transactions without credible evidence of non-arm's length pricing.
Pavan Singh Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed downgraded APARs of a 100% disabled BSF employee, directing grant of MACP benefits, holding that performance appraisal cannot be adversely affected solely due to disability.
Manphool Singh & Anr. v. Ram Chander & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow respondents to lead defence evidence after closure due to negligence, emphasizing justice in partition suits and imposing conditions to ensure diligence.
Mukesh Marwaha & Anr. v. Rajiv Bhakri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XV-A CPC, courts can direct rent deposit during suit pendency even if landlord-tenant relationship is disputed, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Ankit Tayal and Others v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Akshay Tomar and Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/325/506/34 IPC against student petitioners following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Karan Suri & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement and refund of money, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Gladwin Vincent Solomon and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Dheeraj Yadav v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Harjinder @ Ballu & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and proceedings under Sections 323/341/354/506/509/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Silky Soni v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Surender Kumar v. Urmila
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption of liability by showing the improbability of the petitioner's case.
Ajay and Others v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case involving matrimonial offences including rape under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and retraction of allegations by the prosecutrix.
Suman Sachdeva & Ors. v. Jagjit Kaur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to frame additional issues in a suit concerning legal heirship, holding that the issues framed sufficiently covered the controversy and that ancillary disputes are separate causes of action.
M/S. CHANDRA GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS-II) & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the Appellate Authority must consider explanations for delay and has discretionary power to condone delay in GST appeals, setting aside the rejection of a delayed appeal and remanding for fresh consideration.