Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Preet Kaur and Anr. v. Bureau of Immigration and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued by a bank against guarantors, holding that mere loan default does not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Balram Garg v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a company director, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Sahil Chugh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued against bank loan defaulters in absence of criminal proceedings, affirming that fundamental right to travel abroad cannot be curtailed arbitrarily.
Pramod Suri v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a former Additional Director of a company, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Kuldeep Singh Solanki v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a company director, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings does not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Kavuru Bhasker Rao v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a loan guarantor, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings cannot curtail the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Usha Sindhu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a non-executive Director in absence of criminal proceedings, affirming that fundamental right to travel abroad cannot be curtailed merely due to company loan defaults.
Mohit Arora v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued by public sector banks against a petitioner, holding that mere bank loan defaults do not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Shukla Rani v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a loan guarantor, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Ajay Mrig v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a bank loan guarantor, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Jogy Scaria v. Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd from the suit, holding it was not a necessary party as no relief was sought against it and it had no cause of action.
Smt Satula Devi v. Mr Rajeev Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 152 CPC application to correct a clerical error in its earlier judgment with the parties' consent, clarifying the plaintiff's case regarding alienation of family relations rather than property.
Harshvardhan Gautam & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420 and 406 IPC arising from a loan dispute due to an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
C.P. Arya Public Jr. High School v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court declined to reopen CBSE’s online portal for late submission of compartment exam applications due to school’s negligence but directed equitable accommodation of similarly placed students as per a parallel Rajasthan High Court order.
Bibhav Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of Chief Minister’s PS accused of assaulting a sitting MP, citing serious allegations, risk of evidence tampering, and witness influence.
Bloom International School v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court declined to allow late submission of student details for CBSE compartment exams due to missed deadlines and logistical constraints but directed equitable treatment in line with a similar Rajasthan High Court order.
Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court held that arrests under Section 19(1) of the PML Act must satisfy strict statutory preconditions, including furnishing the 'reasons to believe' to the arrestee, and are subject to judicial review to prevent arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Harpreet Singh Talwar @ Kabir Talwar v. The State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea in a major transnational narcotics smuggling case, holding that prima facie evidence and risks of witness tampering justify continued custody under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.
M/s. Autopet; Shweta Jayprakash Singh v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Bombay High Court quashed the arbitrary termination of a petroleum dealership by BPCL where seals were intact and no proof of tampering was found, restoring the petitioners' dealership and supply.
Chhagan Ramchandra Pondkule v. Dhanaji Dinkar Jadhav
The Bombay High Court held that the Competent Authority rightly declined to refer a dispute over compensation apportionment to the Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, as no prima facie dispute over entitlement existed.