Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Swastik Pipe Limited v. PSR Aqua and Engineers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause printed on unsigned tax invoices can constitute a binding arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and referred the dispute to arbitration on a prima facie basis.
Rakesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and absence of independent witnesses, emphasizing that statutory bail embargoes do not override fundamental rights under Article 21.
Rafique Khan v. NCB
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and absence of independent witnesses, overriding the statutory bail embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Sunil Kumar v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity narcotics case, emphasizing that prolonged trial delay and lack of evidence of knowledge justify bail despite stringent NDPS Act provisions.
Noble Chartering Inc v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual clause permitting unilateral termination without cause is valid, set aside the arbitral award’s contrary interpretation, and modified damages and interest accordingly.
Gopal Dangi v. State NCT of Delhi; Mohd Munib v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing that prolonged trial delay and procedural lapses justify bail despite statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Shivam v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged with commercial quantity narcotics offences under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the impact of procedural safeguards, absence of independent witnesses, and prolonged trial delay on bail considerations.
Rizwan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial heroin case under the NDPS Act, emphasizing that prolonged trial delay and absence of independent witnesses justify bail despite statutory embargo.
Ankit Sagar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to procedural infirmities and prolonged trial delay, emphasizing that statutory bail restrictions under Section 37 do not preclude bail where fundamental rights are at stake.
Suresh Kochhar v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consent decree based on a settlement agreement signed by an authorized director, dismissing belated objections to execution for lack of authorization.
Kamla Varma & Ors. v. Surendra Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered family settlement deed is binding and enforceable if bona fide and acted upon, exempt from mandatory registration under Section 17(2)(v) of the Registration Act, and estops parties from denying its terms.
Amit Mishra v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of dowry death after considering completed investigation and absence of risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering, imposing stringent conditions.
Veena Jain & Ors. v. Praveen Jain
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit as settled under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC based on a lawful and voluntary out-of-court settlement, ordering refund of court fees and discharge of HDFC Bank from the suit.
Usha Devi v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements under Section 67 NDPS Act and mere CDR analysis are insufficient for conviction and emphasizing the right to bail and speedy trial under Article 21.
Shri Ashok Kumar Jain v. Mr. Gurpreet Singh
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite the eviction trial based on bonafide requirement and dispose of the matter within six months, emphasizing the need to avoid undue delay.
MS PREETI SAINI v. MR ANKIT CHOPRA
The High Court allowed the petitioner to participate and defend in the annulment proceedings despite initial procedural default, as the respondent did not object and the written statement was on record.
M/S G. F. ELECTRONICS v. ASHISH AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court set aside the ex parte order against the defendant in a commercial suit, allowing the petition to proceed on merits subject to payment of costs and caution against future delays.
Umar Sebandeke v. Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for an accused in a commercial quantity heroin trafficking case under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural lapses do not justify bail and the statutory embargo under Section 37 applies unless twin conditions are met.
Aastha Mishra @ Muskaan v. Mr. Pradeep Tiwari
The Delhi High Court directed that intimate photographs placed on record in a divorce petition be kept in a sealed cover to protect privacy, with their relevance and obscenity to be decided during trial.
Rajiv Bansal v. National Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing the Trial Court to grant the plaintiff an effective opportunity to cross-examine the defendant's witness, emphasizing the necessity of fair trial procedures before closing evidence.