Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pradeep Koneru v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to recall its earlier judgment, rectifying typographical errors regarding the petitioner's status and upholding the constitutional validity of Section 50 PMLA as affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Irvinder Kaur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel respondent's trademark registrations for 'GARNISH' due to prior user rights of the petitioner and non-use by respondent, holding that pending transfer applications do not bar infringement actions.
Delhi Skills Mission Society v. Samuel Foundation Charitable India Trust
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing a VTP's claim for training costs despite biometric attendance irregularities, holding manual attendance and successful trainee assessments suffice to prove contractual performance.
Sarita Devi v. Sanjay Kumar Keshari
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition, upholding the conviction under Section 138 NI Act where the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of debt despite admitted signatures on dishonored cheques.
Suresh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
TERMO ISI SISTEMLERI TICARET VE SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Registrar's order imposing a condition limiting exclusive rights over words in a trademark registration, holding that such conditions reflecting the applicant's own disclaimer are valid and not contrary to the Trade Marks Act.
Yogesh Chander Bhardwaj v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking execution of lease deed for an alternative plot allotted on a disputed and allegedly forged recommendation letter, holding the application time-barred and the letter unauthenticated.
Star Scientific Limited v. The Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller's refusal of a patent application for non-attendance at hearing, holding that a reasoned order considering the applicant's submissions is mandatory before refusal under the Patents Act.
Vandana v. State through SHO PS Amar Colony & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that in urgent habeas corpus cases involving missing persons, Aadhaar data may be disclosed to the Court in sealed cover without prior hearing of the Aadhaar holder, balancing privacy rights with the need to trace the individual.
Ashok Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to brothers accused of rape, holding that the FIR filed after an unexplained delay amid a property dispute may be motivated and not genuine.
Dibakar Karad v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of illicit ganja supply based on co-accused disclosures and corroborative electronic evidence, with custodial interrogation deemed necessary.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed that only verified members as of a fixed date shall vote in cooperative bank elections, barred fresh member induction during elections, and mandated preservation of election records pending dispute resolution.
Shiv Kumar Saxena v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging restoration of electricity supply subject to payment of arrears, holding that disputes over dues and property ownership must be resolved through appropriate legal proceedings rather than writ petitions.
ELANCO TIERGESUNDHEIT AG v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
The Delhi High Court set aside a patent rejection order for lack of reasoned analysis, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of recording reasons in quasi-judicial decisions and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Yugal Sikri v. State of U.P.
The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act must specifically aver breach of a binding settlement and be filed with proper government authority under Section 34(1), and quashed proceedings where these conditions were not met.
Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that State Bar Councils cannot charge enrolment fees beyond the statutory amount prescribed under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, and other fees cannot be made mandatory pre-conditions for enrolment.
YASH DEVELOPERS v. HARIHAR KRUPA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a slum rehabilitation developer's agreement for inordinate delay and lack of bona fide efforts, emphasizing the statutory duty and accountability of authorities under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.
PIC DEPARTMENTALS PVT. LTD. v. SREELEATHERS PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretion to allow a delayed Written Statement due to registry confusion, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.
Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that death after nine months due to injuries inflicted by the accused maintains the chain of causation and the High Court erred in reducing the conviction to attempt to murder.
SBS Biotech & Others v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld prosecution under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act for record-keeping violations, affirmed the three-year limitation period, and confirmed the Special Judge's jurisdiction to try the offences.