Suresh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 30 Jul 2024 · 2024:DHC:5596
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 3706/2024
2024:DHC:5596
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 3706/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 30.07.2024
CRL.M.C. 3706/2024
SURESH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Manish Gupta, Ms. Snehlata and Mr. Jugal Shiva Thakur, Advocates
WITH
Petitioners-in-person.
VERSUS
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State
WITH
Ms.Ankita Kaushik, Ms.Vasuchit
Anand, Mr. Anvesh Chandik and Mr. Shashank Harit, Advocates
WITH
SI Khushbu Jha, PS: Anand Vihar.
Mr. R. P. S. Bhatti, Advocate for R-2
WITH
Respondent No. 2-in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 14210/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0847/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Anand Vihar (East) and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State along with respondent No. 2 in-person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 09.09.2012. Two female children were born out of the wedlock, who are presently in custody of respondent No. 2. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 21.12.2015.

4. The disputes have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 19.09.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 09.01.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Khushbu Jha, PS: Anand Vihar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0847/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Anand Vihar (East) and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JULY 30, 2024