Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Senbo Engineering Limited v. New Era Projects & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to entertain a review application filed after an unexplained delay of five years, upholding the decree against the petitioner.
Bank of Baroda v. Sh Lakshman Shetty
Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction under Article 227 when the cause of action arose outside its territory and permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. SHASHANK SINGH TOMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of contractual Welfare Officers with continuous service over ten years against sanctioned posts, applying the principles of Uma Devi and related Supreme Court precedents.
Sudhir Kumar & Anr. v. M/S Escorts Kubota Ltd.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to defer the matter but granted one last opportunity to cross-examine a witness subject to costs to balance fairness and timely disposal.
Aabid Ali & Ors. v. State Through SHO P.S. Sonia Vihar & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
The Union of India v. Vittal Rathla
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing consideration of promotion claims of eligible employees despite ongoing cadre review and administrative delays, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Union of India & Anr. v. Ved Prakash
The Delhi High Court quashed Tribunal orders granting MACP benefits based on a non-precedential Supreme Court dismissal but directed the petitioners to release the respondent’s pension and retiral benefits without recovery.
MYPREFERRED TRANSFORMATION AND HOSPITALITY PVT LTD v. HOTEL SUPREME
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension to the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondent.
National Highways Authority of India v. Madurai Tuticorin Expressways Ltd
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by nine months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Zimmer India Pvt Ltd v. AhujaSons Surgicals
The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
RVR Infrastructure Ltd v. Sanjhi Exim Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld its crystallized payment order in an arbitration-related dispute, ruling that the petitioner discharged its liabilities despite conflicting interest calculations, and dismissed the petition.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that payments made towards community welfare under a trade union settlement are allowable business expenses under Section 37(1) and not disallowable under Section 40A(9) of the Income Tax Act.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Sunita Virendra @ Birendra Sahani
The High Court upheld the MACT award fixing notional income and affirmed parents' entitlement to compensation as legal representatives despite separate residence, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Sunanda Wakhare v. Jaiwant Bhaguji Gadekar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the State Government bears primary liability to pay back wages awarded by the School Tribunal, upheld execution orders against the Education Officer as State representative, and dismissed the writ petition challenging recovery proceedings.
Mitsubishi Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Tax (2)(2)(1) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has plenary powers to entertain additional grounds not raised in the return, and the AO must consider such grounds despite CBDT Circular No. 549/1989, quashing the final assessment order and directing fresh consideration.
Ajay Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to quash FIR and proceedings against a former director of Amrapali Group, holding that serious allegations in the forensic audit report justify continuation of criminal investigation despite his non-naming in the FIR or charge-sheet.
Vishal Khullar v. The State (Government of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR alleging use of forged Schengen visa, holding that delay in investigation alone does not warrant quashing and offences under IPC and Passport Act are prima facie made out.
Rajiv Jaiswal v. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that all conditions in Clause 26 of the General Insurance Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 must be cumulatively satisfied to add extra years to qualifying service, dismissing the petitioner's claim for additional pension benefits.
Bhushan Tiwari & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Jasroop Singh Sodhi v. State Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.